Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact

被引:28
作者
Kiesewetter, Jan [1 ]
Sailer, Michael [2 ]
Jung, Valentina M. [1 ]
Schoenberger, Regina [1 ]
Bauer, Elisabeth [2 ]
Zottmann, Jan M. [1 ]
Hege, Inga [3 ]
Zimmermann, Hanna [4 ]
Fischer, Frank [2 ]
Fischer, Martin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Inst Med Educ, Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Educ & Educ Psychol, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Augsburg, Sch Med, Augsburg, Germany
[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Munich, Germany
关键词
Instructional materials; methods; Clinical reasoning; Virtual patients; Case formats; COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY; EXAMPLES; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-020-1987-y
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction Clinical reasoning has been fostered with varying case formats including the use of virtual patients. Existing literature points to different conclusions regarding which format is most beneficial for learners with diverse levels of prior knowledge. We designed our study to better understand which case format affects clinical reasoning outcomes and cognitive load, dependent on medical students' prior knowledge. Methods Overall, 142 medical students (3 rd to 6 th year) were randomly assigned to either a whole case or serial cue case format. Participants worked on eight virtual patients in their respective case format. Outcomes included diagnostic accuracy, knowledge, and cognitive load. Results We found no effect of case format on strategic knowledge scores pre- vs post-test (whole case learning gain = 3, 95% CI. -.01 to .01, serial cue learning gain = 3, 95% CI. -.06 to .00 p = .50). In both case formats, students with high baseline knowledge (determined by median split on the pre-test in conceptual knowledge) benefitted from learning with virtual patients (learning gain in strategic knowledge = 5, 95% CI .03 to .09, p = .01) while students with low prior knowledge did not (learning gain = 0, 95%CI -.02 to .02). We found no difference in diagnostic accuracy between experimental conditions (difference = .44, 95% CI -.96 to .08, p = .22), but diagnostic accuracy was higher for students with high prior knowledge compared to those with low prior knowledge (difference = .8, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.35, p < .01). Students with low prior knowledge experienced higher extraneous cognitive load than students with high prior knowledge (multiple measurements, p < .01). Conclusions The whole case and serial cue case formats alone did not affect students' knowledge gain or diagnostic accuracy. Students with lower knowledge experienced increased cognitive load and appear to have learned less from their interaction with virtual patients. Cognitive load should be taken into account when attempting to help students learn clinical reasoning with virtual patients, especially for students with lower knowledge.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study
    Bateman, James
    Allen, Maggie
    Samani, Dipti
    Kidd, Jane
    Davies, David
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 47 (06) : 595 - 606
  • [2] Representation scaffolds improve diagnostic efficiency in medical students
    Braun, Leah T.
    Zottmann, Jan M.
    Adolf, Christian
    Lottspeich, Christian
    Then, Cornelia
    Wirth, Stefan
    Fischer, Martin R.
    Schmidmaier, Ralf
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 51 (11) : 1118 - 1126
  • [3] Self-explanation in learning clinical reasoning: the added value of examples and prompts
    Chamberland, Martine
    Mamede, Silvia
    St-Onge, Christina
    Setrakian, Jean
    Bergeron, Linda
    Schmidt, Henk
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 49 (02) : 193 - 202
  • [4] COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY AND THE FORMAT OF INSTRUCTION
    CHANDLER, P
    SWELLER, J
    [J]. COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 1991, 8 (04) : 293 - 332
  • [5] Chernikova O, 2019, EDUC PSYCHOL REV, P1
  • [6] A POWER PRIMER
    COHEN, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [7] Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps
    Cook, David A.
    Triola, Marc M.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 43 (04) : 303 - 311
  • [8] G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
    Faul, Franz
    Erdfelder, Edgar
    Lang, Albert-Georg
    Buchner, Axel
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) : 175 - 191
  • [9] Diagnostic Performance by Medical Students Working Individually or in Teams
    Hautz, Wolf E.
    Kaemmer, Juliane E.
    Schauber, Stefan K.
    Spies, Claudia D.
    Gaissmaier, Wolfgang
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (03): : 303 - 304
  • [10] Uncovering the relation between clinical reasoning and diagnostic accuracy - An analysis of learner's clinical reasoning processes in virtual patients
    Hege, Inga
    Kononowicz, Andrzej A.
    Kiesewetter, Jan
    Foster-Johnson, Lynn
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10):