Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Double-Row Suture-Bridging Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques Using Different Medial-Row Configurations

被引:74
作者
Pauly, Stephan [1 ]
Kieser, Bettina [1 ]
Schill, Alexander [2 ]
Gerhardt, Christian [1 ]
Scheibel, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Ctr Musculoskeletal Surg, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Julius Wolff Inst, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
ARTHROSCOPIC SINGLE-ROW; ANCHOR TECHNIQUE; FIXATION; EQUIVALENT; FOOTPRINT; INTEGRITY; STRENGTH; TRIAL; TEARS; KNOTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Biomechanical comparison of different suture-bridge configurations of the medial row with respect to initial construct stability (time 0, porcine model). Methods: In 40 porcine fresh-frozen shoulders, the infraspinatus tendons were dissected from their insertions. All specimens were operated on by use of the suture-bridge technique, only differing in terms of the medial-row suture-grasping configuration, and randomized into 4 groups: (1) single-mattress (SM) technique, (2) double-mattress (DM) technique, (3) cross-stitch (CS) technique, and (4) double-pulley (DP) technique. Identical suture anchors were used for all specimens (medial: Bio-Corkscrew FT 5.5 [Arthrex, Naples, FL]; lateral: Bio-PushLock 3.5 [Arthrex]). All repairs were cyclically loaded from 10 to 60 N until 10 to 200 N (20-N stepwise increase after 50 cycles each) with a material testing machine. Forces at 3 and 5 mm of gap formation, mode of failure, and maximum load to failure were recorded. Results: The DM technique had the highest ultimate tensile strength (368.6 +/- 99.5 N) compared with the DP (248.4 +/- 122.7 N), SM (204.3 +/- 90 N), and CS (184.9 +/- 63.8 N) techniques (P = .004). The DM technique provided maximal force resistance until 3 and 5 mm of gap formation (90.0 +/- 18.1 N and 128.0 +/- 32.3 N, respectively) compared with the CS (72 +/- 8.9 N and 108 +/- 20.2 N, respectively), SM (66.0 +/- 8.9 N and 90.0 +/- 26.9 N, respectively), and DP (62.2 +/- 6.2 N and 71 +/- 13.2 N, respectively) techniques (P < .05 for each 3 and 5 mm of gap formation). The main failure mode was suture cutting through the tendon. Conclusions: Comparing the 4 different suture-bridge techniques, we found that modified application of suture-bridge repair with double medial mattress stitches significantly enhanced biomechanical construct stability at time 0 in this porcine ex vivo model. Clinical Relevance: This technique increases initial stability and resistance to suture cutting through the rotator cuff tendon after arthroscopic suture-bridge repair.
引用
收藏
页码:1281 / 1288
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   A stepwise approach to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on biomechanical principles [J].
Burkhart, SS .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2000, 16 (01) :82-90
[2]   THE DEADMAN THEORY OF SUTURE ANCHORS - OBSERVATIONS ALONG A SOUTH TEXAS FENCE LINE [J].
BURKHART, SS .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1995, 11 (01) :119-123
[3]   A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Single- and Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Early Clinical Evaluation [J].
Burks, Robert T. ;
Crim, Julia ;
Brown, Nick ;
Fink, Barbara ;
Greis, Patrick E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (04) :674-682
[4]   A biomechanical comparison of 2 technical variations of double-row rotator cuff fixation - The importance of medial row knots [J].
Busfield, Benjamin T. ;
Glousman, Ronald E. ;
McGarry, Michelle H. ;
Tibone, James E. ;
Lee, Thay Q. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (05) :901-906
[5]   Optimization of stacked half-hitch knots for arthroscopic surgery [J].
Chan, KC ;
Burkhart, SS ;
Thiagarajan, P ;
Goh, JCH .
ARTHROSCOPY, 2001, 17 (07) :752-759
[6]   Can a double-row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of double-row and single-row anchorage techniques with computed tomographic arthrography tendon healing assessment [J].
Charousset, Christophe ;
Grimberg, Jean ;
Duranthon, Louis Denis ;
Bellaiche, Laurance ;
Petrover, David .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (08) :1247-1253
[7]   In vitro analysis of rotator cuff repairs: A comparison of arthroscopically inserted tacks or anchors with open transosseous repairs [J].
Chhabra, A ;
Goradia, VK ;
Francke, EI ;
Baer, GS ;
Monahan, T ;
Kline, AJ ;
Miller, MD .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (03) :323-327
[8]   Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: An in vivo and ex vivo investigation [J].
Cummins, CA ;
Strickland, S ;
Appleyard, RC ;
Szomor, ZL ;
Marshall, J ;
Murrell, GAC .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2003, 19 (03) :239-248
[9]   The Insertional footprint of the rotator cuff: An anatomic study [J].
Curtis, AS ;
Burbank, KM ;
Tierney, JJ ;
Scheller, AD ;
Curran, AR .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (06) :603-609
[10]   Anatomy and dimensions of rotator cuff insertions [J].
Dugas, JR ;
Campbell, DA ;
Warren, RF ;
Robie, BH ;
Millett, PJ .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (05) :498-503