Solving conservation planning problems with integer linear programming

被引:104
作者
Beyer, Hawthorne L. [1 ]
Dujardin, Yann [2 ]
Watts, Matthew E. [1 ]
Possingham, Hugh P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, ARC Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] CSIRO Ecosyst Sci, Ecosci Precinct, Dutton Pk, Qld 4102, Australia
关键词
Reserve selection; Optimisation; Heuristics; Simulated annealing; Prioritisation; RESERVE SITE SELECTION; SOUTH-AUSTRALIA; PROTECTED AREAS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHMS; BIODIVERSITY; ROBUSTNESS; NETWORK; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.02.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Deciding where to implement conservation actions in order to meet conservation targets efficiently is an important component of systematic conservation planning. Mathematical optimisation is a quantitative and transparent framework for solving these problems. Despite several advantages of exact methods such as integer linear programming (ILP), most conservation planning problems to date have been solved using heuristic approaches such as simulated annealing (SA). We explain how to implement common conservation planning problems (e.g. Marxan and Marxan With Zones) in an ILP framework and how these formulations can be extended to account for spatial dependencies among planning units, such as those arising from environmental flows (e.g. rivers). Using simulated datasets, we demonstrate that ILP outperforms SA with respect to both solution quality (how close it is to optimality) and processing time over a range of problem sizes. For modestly sized quadratic problems (100,000 spatial units and 10 species), for example, a processing time of approximately 14 h was required for SA to achieve a solution within 19% of optimality, while ILP achieved solutions within 0.5% of optimality within 30 s. For the largest quadratic problems we evaluated processing time exceeding one day was required for SA to achieve a solution within 49% of optimality, while ILP achieved solutions within 0.5% of optimality in approximately one hour. Heuristics are conceptually simple and can be applied to large and non-linear objective functions but unlike ILP, produce solutions of unknown quality. We also discuss how ILP approaches also facilitate quantification of trade-off curves and sensitivity analysis. When solving linear or quadratic conservation planning problems we recommend using ILP over heuristic approaches whenever possible. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 22
页数:9
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [21] Persistence and vulnerability: retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas
    Gaston, KJ
    Pressey, RL
    Margules, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 2002, 27 (04) : 361 - 384
  • [22] Ecoregion-Based Conservation Planning in the Mediterranean: Dealing with Large-Scale Heterogeneity
    Giakoumi, Sylvaine
    Sini, Maria
    Gerovasileiou, Vasilis
    Mazor, Tessa
    Beher, Jutta
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Abdulla, Ameer
    Cinar, Melih Ertan
    Dendrinos, Panagiotis
    Gucu, Ali Cemal
    Karamanlidis, Alexandros A.
    Rodic, Petra
    Panayotidis, Panayotis
    Taskin, Ergun
    Jaklin, Andrej
    Voultsiadou, Eleni
    Webster, Chloe
    Zenetos, Argyro
    Katsanevakis, Stelios
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [23] An integer optimization approach to a probabilistic reserve site selection problem
    Haight, RG
    Revelle, CS
    Snyder, SA
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 48 (05) : 697 - 708
  • [24] Addressing longitudinal connectivity in the systematic conservation planning of fresh waters
    Hermoso, V.
    Linke, S.
    Prenda, J.
    Possingham, H. P.
    [J]. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (01) : 57 - 70
  • [25] The relationship between multi-objective robustness concepts and set-valued optimization
    Ide, Jonas
    Koebis, Elisabeth
    Kuroiwa, Daishi
    Schoebel, Anita
    Tammer, Christiane
    [J]. FIXED POINT THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2014,
  • [26] OPTIMIZATION BY SIMULATED ANNEALING
    KIRKPATRICK, S
    GELATT, CD
    VECCHI, MP
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1983, 220 (4598) : 671 - 680
  • [27] Tradeoffs in marine reserve design: habitat condition, representation, and socioeconomic costs
    Klein, Carissa J.
    Tulloch, Vivitskaia J.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Selkoe, Kimberly A.
    Watts, Matthew E.
    Steinback, Charles
    Scholz, Astrid
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2013, 6 (05): : 324 - 332
  • [28] Forest conservation delivers highly variable coral reef conservation outcomes
    Klein, Carissa J.
    Jupiter, Stacy D.
    Selig, Elizabeth R.
    Watts, Matthew E.
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Kamal, Muhammad
    Roelfsema, Chris
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2012, 22 (04) : 1246 - 1256
  • [29] Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap
    Knight, Andrew T.
    Cowling, Richard M.
    Rouget, Mathieu
    Balmford, Andrew
    Lombard, Amanda T.
    Campbell, Bruce M.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) : 610 - 617
  • [30] Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning
    Kukkala, Aija S.
    Moilanen, Atte
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2013, 88 (02) : 443 - 464