Quantitative microbial risk assessment and Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling: two case studies

被引:0
|
作者
O'Toole, J. [1 ]
Sinclair, M. [1 ]
Leder, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
FOOD AUSTRALIA | 2010年 / 62卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Pressure on the world's water supply has directed increasing attention to the use of recycled water in food production and processing. Municipal sewage, unless sufficiently treated, may provide a means by which pathogenic microorganisms enter the food chain through contaminated irrigation or wash water. Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling (AGWR) have been developed using the process of Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA). This process comprises four parts: hazard identification, dose response, exposure assessment, and risk characterisation and results in an output estimate of the burden of disease in a given population over a given period. QMRA may be used as a tool to promote science-based decision making processes, set priorities among different safety problems, identify gaps in scientific knowledge, and to improve control systems and develop guidelines. AGWR (Phase 1) specify a range of indicative treatment processes, exposure reductions and water quality objectives that support a fit-for-purpose approach in relation to using recycled water for non-potable uses. These include livestock drinking water, dairy shed wash down, pasture or fodder crop irrigation and irrigation of food crops (home grown and commercial). This paper discusses the QMRA process and assumptions made in relation to exposure estimates in AGWR guidelines using two case study examples, as well as outlining existing data gaps.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 412
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A robust scenario analysis approach to water recycling quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Jones, Christopher H.
    Wylie, Varsha
    Ford, Hannah
    Fawell, John
    Holmer, Melanie
    Bell, Katherine
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 134 (03)
  • [2] Quantitative microbial risk assessment - An Australian perspective
    Vanderlinde, P
    FOOD AUSTRALIA, 1998, 50 (12): : 626 - 628
  • [3] Guidelines to Evaluate Human Observational Studies for Quantitative Risk Assessment
    Vlaanderen, Jelle
    Vermeulen, Roel
    Heederik, Dick
    Kromhout, Hans
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 116 (12) : 1700 - 1705
  • [4] Special issue: Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Reclaimed Water
    Schoen, Mary E.
    MICROBIAL RISK ANALYSIS, 2017, 5 : 1 - 2
  • [5] Quantitative risk assessment in the Water Safety Plan: Case studies from drinking water practice
    KWR Watercycle Research Institute, Groningenhaven 73433, PE Nieuwegein, Netherlands
    Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply, 2009, 2 (127-132):
  • [6] Quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Berg, G
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (05) : 979 - 980
  • [7] Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Salmonella in Surface Water as a Source of Tap Water
    Banmairuroy, Paweeranut
    Chaichana, Phattharaporn
    Pulsrikarn, Chaiwat
    Nuanualsuwan, Suphachai
    THAI JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2014, 44 (01): : 95 - 106
  • [8] Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Recreational Exposure to Water Bodies in Philadelphia
    Sunger, Neha
    Haas, Charles N.
    WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2015, 87 (03) : 211 - 222
  • [9] Quantitative microbial risk assessment of repairs of the drinking water distribution system
    Blokker, Mirjam
    Smeets, Patrick
    Medema, Gertjan
    MICROBIAL RISK ANALYSIS, 2018, 8 : 22 - 31
  • [10] Developing best practice guidelines for lake modelling to inform quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Yu, Songyan
    Sturm, Katrin
    Gibbes, Badin
    Kennard, Mark J.
    Veal, Cameron J.
    Middleton, Duncan
    Fisher, Paul L.
    Rotherham, Simon
    Hamilton, David P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2022, 150