Repeat Retrourethral Transobturator Sling in the Management of Recurrent Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence After Failed First Male Sling

被引:53
作者
Soljanik, Irina [1 ]
Becker, Armin J. [1 ]
Stief, Christian G. [1 ]
Gozzi, Christian [1 ]
Bauer, Ricarda M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Dept Urol, D-8000 Munich, Germany
关键词
Failed sling suspension; Functional sling suspension; Male sling; Postprostatectomy incontinence; Radical prostatectomy; Re-sling implantation; Retrourethral transobturator sling; FOLLOW-UP; PROSTATECTOMY; SUSPENSION; SPHINCTER; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2010.08.034
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A failure rate between 20% and 45.5% after retrourethral trans-obturator sling (RTS) is reported. Recommendations for the management of persistent or recurrent postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after failed male sling do not exist. Objective: The aim of this study was the prospective evaluation of the efficacy of repeat RTS (RRTS) in patients after failed first RTS. Design, setting, and participants: Between March 2007 and August 2009, 35 patients with mild to severe SUI after failed first RTS were treated with a second AdVance sling (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA). Measurements: Preoperative and postoperative evaluation included daily pad use, 1-hr pad test, postvoiding residual (PVR) urine, uroflowmetry, and quality-of-life (QoL) scores. Results and limitations: After 6 mo, 45.5% (15 of 33 patients) showed no pad use; 30.3% (10 of 33 patients), one dry "security'' pad; 3% (1 of 33 patients), one wet pad; 6.1% (2 of 33 patients), two pads; 3% (1 of 33 patients), pad reduction >= 50%; and 12.1% (4 of 33 patients), treatment failure. After 16.6 mo, 34.5% (10 of 29 patients) showed no pad use; 37.9% (11 of 29 patients), one dry "security'' pad; 3.4% (1 of 29 patients), one wet pad; 3.4% (1 of 29 patients), two pads; 10.3% (3 of 29 patients), pad reduction >= 50%; and 10.4% (3 of 29 patients), treatment failure. Daily pad use and pad weight decreased significantly. PVR and uroflowmetry results showed no significant change. QoL improved significantly. Postoperative acute urinary retention was observed in 23.6% of patients. Conclusions: RRTS is an effective and safe treatment option for the management of SUI after failed first RTS. (C) 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:767 / 772
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[11]   The fate of the 'modern' artificial urinary sphincter with a follow-up of more than 10 years [J].
Fulford, SCV ;
Sutton, C ;
Bales, G ;
Hickling, M ;
Stephenson, TP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (05) :713-716
[12]  
Gozzi C, 2008, EUR UROL, V54, P257, DOI [10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.098, 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.096]
[13]   Surgical Treatment of Stress Incontinence in Men [J].
Herschom, Sender ;
Bruschini, Homero ;
Comiter, Craig ;
Grise, Philippe ;
Hanus, Tomas ;
Kirschner-Hermanns, Ruth ;
Abrams, Paul .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2010, 29 (01) :179-190
[14]   Tension-Free Vaginal Tape in the Management of Recurrent Urodynamic Stress Incontinence after Previous Failed Midurethral Tape [J].
Liapis, Angelos ;
Bakas, Panagiotis ;
Creatsas, Georgios .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (06) :1450-1458
[15]   Males Slings: Compressive versus Repositioning [J].
Montague, Drogo K. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (06) :934-935
[16]   Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy [J].
Rehder, Peter ;
Gozzi, Christian .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 52 (03) :860-867
[17]   An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial [J].
Romano, SV ;
Metrebian, SE ;
Vaz, F ;
Muller, V ;
D'Ancona, CA ;
De Souza, EAC ;
Nakamura, F .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 97 (03) :533-539
[18]  
SCHRODER A, 2009, EAU GUIDELINES, P11
[19]   The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters [J].
Venn, SN ;
Greenwell, TJ ;
Mundy, AR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (03) :702-706