Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task

被引:110
作者
Gonthier, Corentin [1 ]
Braver, Todd S. [2 ]
Bugg, Julie M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Savoie Mt Blanc, LPNC UMR CNRS 5105, Chambery, France
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Campus Box 1125,1 Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
Cognitive control; Dual Mechanisms of Control (DMC); Stroop interference; List-wide proportion congruency; Item-specific proportion congruency; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; COGNITIVE CONTROL; PROPORTION CONGRUENT; INTERFERENCE; EXPECTATIONS; MECHANISMS; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-016-0591-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Dual Mechanisms of Control framework posits the existence of two distinct control mechanisms, proactive and reactive, which may operate independently. However, this independence has been difficult to study with most experimental paradigms. The Stroop task may provide a useful way of assessing the independence of control mechanisms because the task elicits two types of proportion congruency effects, list-wide and item-specific, thought to reflect proactive and reactive control respectively. The present research tested whether these two proportion congruency effects can be used to dissociate proactive and reactive control. In 2 separate participant samples, we demonstrate that list-wide and item-specific proportion congruency effects are stable, exist in the same participants, and appear in different task conditions. Moreover, we identify two distinct behavioral signatures, the congruency cost and the transfer cost, which doubly dissociate the two effects. Together, the results are consistent with the view that proactive and reactive control reflect independent mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 788
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条