Dispersion, experimental apparatus, and the acceptance of the wave theory of light

被引:1
作者
Chen, X [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif Lutheran Univ, Dept Philosophy, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00033799800200261
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
This paper concentrates on a debate over dispersion in the second half of the 1830s, in which both sides utilized the same set of experimental data to test a proposed wave account of dispersion, but could not agree on how these data should be used. The conflict regarding experimental data was caused by differences in instruments. In the debate, optical instruments in many ways functioned like paradigms, shaping scientists' opinions. Instruments also led the debate into an impasse, because no apparatus was available for the necessary experimental replication. Because of unreconcilable differences regarding experimental evidence, the wave theory's failure in explaining dispersion did not become an obstacle to its acceptance.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 420
页数:20
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1992, Science as Practice and Culture, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226668208.001.0001
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1802, PHILOS T R SOC LONDO, DOI DOI 10.1098/RSTL.1802.0014
  • [3] BREWSTER D, 1822, EDINBURGH ENCY, V15, P589
  • [4] BREWSTER D, 1938, ATHENAEUM, V577, P826
  • [5] BREWSTER D, 1938, ATHENAEUM, V580, P876
  • [6] BREWSTER D, 1994, MUSE REASON RELATION, P203
  • [7] BREWSTER D, 1819, TREATISE KALEIDOSCOP, P129
  • [8] Brewster D., 1833, PHILOS MAG, V2, P360
  • [9] BREWSTER D, 1823, T ROY SOC EDINBURGH, V9, P434
  • [10] BREWSTER D, 1834, T R SOC EDINBURGH, V12, P519