From self to social cognition: Theory of Mind mechanisms and their relation to Executive Functioning

被引:86
作者
Bradford, Elisabeth E. F. [1 ]
Jentzsch, Ines [1 ]
Gomez, Juan-Carlos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Sch Psychol & Neurosci, St Andrews KY16 9JP, Fife, Scotland
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Theory of Mind; False belief; Belief attribution; Social cognition; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; INHIBITORY CONTROL; DUAL-TASK; BELIEF; AUTISM; CHILDREN; REPRESENTATION; INTENTIONS; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
'Theory of Mind' refers to the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and other people (Premack 82 Woodruff, 1978). This study examined the extent to which 'Self' and 'Other' belief-attribution processes within the Theory of Mind (TOM) mechanism could be distinguished behaviourally, and whether these separable components differentially related to Executive Functioning (EF) abilities. A computerized false-belief task, utilizing a matched-design to allow direct comparison of self-oriented vs. other-oriented belief-attribution, was used to assess ToM, and a face-image Stroop task was employed to assess EF, within a population of typically-developed adults. Results revealed significantly longer reaction times when attributing beliefs to other people as opposed to recognizing and attributing beliefs to oneself. Intriguingly, results revealed that 'perspective-shift' requirements (i.e. changing from adoption of the 'self' perspective to the perspective of the 'other', or vice versa) across false-belief trials influenced reaction times. Reaction times were significantly longer when the perspective shift was from self-to-other than from other-to-self. It is suggested that the 'self' forms the stem of understanding the 'other', and is therefore processed regardless of ultimate task demands; in contrast, the 'other' perspective is only processed when explicitly required. We conclude that adopting another person's perspective, even when their belief state is matched to one's own, requires more cognitive effort than recalling and reflecting on self-oriented belief-states. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 34
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Executive Function Mechanisms of Theory of Mind
    Ahmed, Fayeza S.
    Miller, L. Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2011, 41 (05) : 667 - 678
  • [2] Anderson V., 2002, PRINCIPLES FRONTAL L, P1
  • [3] [Anonymous], BRIT J DEV PSYCHOL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2000, UNDERSTANDING OTHER
  • [5] Is belief reasoning automatic?
    Apperly, Ian A.
    Riggs, Kevin J.
    Simpson, Andrew
    Chiavarino, Claudia
    Samson, Dana
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (10) : 841 - 844
  • [6] Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults' ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker
    Apperly, Ian A.
    Carroll, Daniel J.
    Samson, Dana
    Humphreys, Glyn W.
    Qureshi, Adam
    Moffitt, Graham
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 63 (06) : 1201 - 1217
  • [7] Studies of Adults Can Inform Accounts of Theory of Mind Development
    Apperly, Ian A.
    Samson, Dana
    Humphreys, Glyn W.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 45 (01) : 190 - 201
  • [8] Two sources of evidence on the non-automaticity of true and false belief ascription
    Back, Elisa
    Apperly, Ian A.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2010, 115 (01) : 54 - 70
  • [9] The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism
    Baron-Cohen, S
    Wheelwright, S
    Hill, J
    Raste, Y
    Plumb, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 42 (02) : 241 - 251
  • [10] DOES THE AUTISTIC-CHILD HAVE A THEORY OF MIND
    BARONCOHEN, S
    LESLIE, AM
    FRITH, U
    [J]. COGNITION, 1985, 21 (01) : 37 - 46