Methodology for decision support among conflicting objectives using process simulators

被引:0
作者
Ramzan, Naveed [1 ]
Witt, Werner [1 ]
机构
[1] Brandenburg Tech Univ Cottbus, Lehrstuhl Anlagen & Sicherheitstech, D-03044 Cottbus, Germany
来源
16TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING AND 9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING | 2006年 / 21卷
关键词
Multiobjective decision making; Pareto approach; distillation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
For solving multiobjective decision making problems, which may arise during optimization of operating or design of process plants, a systematic and effective procedure is required. As far as the process or control system has to be modified process simulators like Aspen Plus are widely used. But these simulators are not designed for investigation of other objectives as environment and safety. Due to complex and conflicting nature of multiobjective decision making an integrated optimization tool should be of value. In this paper a systematic methodology and its different stages to deal this problem is presented. The methodology consists of four stages/layers: 1) Problem definition and generation of process alternatives 2) Analysis of alternatives 3) Multiobjective optimization 4) Alternative design evaluation layer. The multiobjective optimization layer is based on goal programming using Aspen Plus and the optimization tool of MatLab. Relevant aspects of the methodology - so far up to now developed - is explained and demonstrated with the help of an industrial separation process.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 420
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Process synthesis and optimisation tools for environmental design: methodology and structure
    Alexander, B
    Barton, G
    Petrie, J
    Romagnoli, J
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 24 (2-7) : 1195 - 1200
  • [2] The application of life cycle assessment to process optimisation
    Azapagic, A
    Clift, R
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 23 (10) : 1509 - 1526
  • [3] Multiobjective optimization by genetic algorithms: application to safety systems
    Busacca, PG
    Marseguerra, M
    Zio, E
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 72 (01) : 59 - 74
  • [4] Plant-wide waste management. 1. Synthesis and multiobjective design
    Chakraborty, A
    Linninger, AA
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2002, 41 (18) : 4591 - 4604
  • [5] Systematic framework for environmentally conscious chemical process design: Early and detailed design stages
    Chen, H
    Shonnard, DR
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2004, 43 (02) : 535 - 552
  • [6] Multiobjective optimization for safety-related decision making in chemical processes
    Kim, DW
    Yeo, YK
    Moon, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 2004, 37 (02) : 332 - 337
  • [7] Ecological and economic objective functions for screening in integrated development of fine chemical processes. 2. Stream allocation and case studies
    Koller, G
    Weirich, D
    Brogli, F
    Heinzle, E
    Hoffmann, VH
    Verduyn, MA
    Hungerbuhler, K
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1998, 37 (08) : 3408 - 3413
  • [8] A material-centric methodology for developing inherently safer environmentally benign processes
    Palaniappan, C
    Srinivasan, R
    Halim, I
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 26 (4-5) : 757 - 774
  • [9] Environmental criteria in design
    Sharratt, P
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 23 (10) : 1469 - 1475
  • [10] Methodology for environmental risk assessment of industrial nonroutine releases
    Stefanis, SK
    Pistikopoulos, EN
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1997, 36 (09) : 3694 - 3707