Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Guided Bone Regeneration Using Particulate Bone Substitutes and Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in a Digital Workflow: 6 Month Results of a Prospective Cohort Study Based on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Data

被引:13
作者
Wang, Maoxia [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Li, Yazhen [2 ]
Mo, Anchun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, State Key Lab Oral Dis, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Dept Oral Implantol,West China Hosp Stomatol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, State Key Lab Oral Dis, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis, Dept Orthodont,West China Hosp Stomatol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
computer-aided surgery; guided bone regeneration; lateral ridge augmentation; injectable platelet-rich fibrin; VOLUME STABILITY; WOUND CLOSURE; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; GBR MATERIALS; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.3390/ma14216430
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study aimed to test whether or not a digital workflow for GBR with particulate bone substitutes and injectable platelet-rich fibrin improved the thickness of the hard tissue compared to the conventional workflow. 26 patients in need of lateral bone augmentation were enrolled. GBR with particulate bone substitutes and injectable platelet-rich fibrin was performed in all patients. Patients were divided into two groups: control (conventional workflow; n = 14) and test (digital workflow; n = 12). CBCT scans were performed before surgery, immediately after wound closure, and 6 months post-surgery, and the labial thickness of the hard tissue (LT) was assessed at 0-5 mm apical to the implant shoulder (LT0-LT5) at each time point. A total of 26 patients were included in this study. After wound closure, the test group showed significantly greater thickness in LT0-LT2 than the control group (LT0: test: 4.31 +/- 0.73 mm, control: 2.99 +/- 1.02 mm; LT1: test: 4.55 +/- 0.69 mm, control: 3.60 +/- 0.96 mm; LT2: test: 4.76 +/- 0.54 mm, control: 4.05 +/- 1.01 mm; p < 0.05). At 6 months, significant differences in LT0-LT1 were detected between the groups (LT0: test: 1.88 +/- 0.57 mm, control: 1.08 +/- 0.60 mm; LT1: test: 2.36 +/- 0.66 mm, control: 1.69 +/- 0.58 mm; p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, the use of digital workflow in GBR with particulate bone substitutes and i-PRF exerted a positive effect on the labial thickness of hard tissue in the coronal portion of the implant after wound closure and at 6 months.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Block Allograft Technique versus Standard Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Amorfini, Leonardo ;
Migliorati, Marco ;
Signori, Alessio ;
Silvestrini-Biavati, Armando ;
Benedicenti, Stefano .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (05) :655-667
[2]   The alveolar ridge splitting/expansion technique: a systematic review [J].
Bassetti, Mario A. ;
Bassetti, Renzo G. ;
Bosshardt, Dieter D. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (03) :310-324
[3]   Hard tissue changes after guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects comparing block versus particulate bone substitutes: 6-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
Benic, Goran, I ;
Eisner, Barbara M. ;
Jung, Ronald E. ;
Basler, Tobias ;
Schneider, David ;
Hammerle, Christoph H. F. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (10) :1016-1026
[4]   Guided bone regeneration with particulate vs. block xenogenic bone substitutes: a pilot cone beam computed tomographic investigation [J].
Benic, Goran I. ;
Thoma, Daniel S. ;
Jung, Ronald E. ;
Sanz-Martin, Ignacio ;
Unger, Silvan ;
Cantalapiedra, Antonio ;
Hammerle, Christoph H. F. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) :E262-E270
[5]   Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration [J].
Benic, Goran I. ;
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2014, 66 (01) :13-40
[6]  
Buser D, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P43
[7]   The positive effect of tenting screws for primary horizontal guided bone regeneration: A retrospective study based on cone-beam computed tomography data [J].
Cesar Neto, Joao B. ;
Cavalcanti, Marilia C. ;
Sapata, Vitor M. ;
Pannuti, Claudio M. ;
Hammerle, Christoph H. F. ;
Naenni, Nadja ;
Thoma, Daniel S. ;
Romito, Giuseppe A. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (09) :846-855
[8]   Analysis of Complications Following Augmentation With Cancellous Block Allografts [J].
Chaushu, Gavriel ;
Mardinger, Ofer ;
Peleg, Michael ;
Ghelfan, Oded ;
Nissan, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 81 (12) :1759-1764
[9]  
Chenchev Ivan L, 2017, Folia Med (Plovdiv), V59, P362, DOI 10.1515/folmed-2017-0044
[10]   Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants [J].
Chiapasco, Matteo ;
Zaniboni, Marco ;
Boisco, Maurizio .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 :136-159