Measuring contingencies: Using scales to measure public relations practitioner limits to accommodation

被引:37
作者
Reber, BH [1 ]
Cameron, GT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Coll Communn & Informat Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107769900308000212
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The contingency theory of accommodation in public relations posits that public relations practice moves on a continuum from total client or employer advocacy to total accommodation of a public. A survey of ninety-one top public relations practitioners was used to quantify contingency theory by constructing scales of five theoretical constructs: external threats, external public characteristics, organizational characteristics, public relations department characteristics, and dominant coalition characteristics. While the default response of practitioners was that bridge building is the best public relations practice, specific contingencies were found to limit bridge building or accommodation. Practitioners cited fear of legitimizing activist claims, credibility and commitment of an external public, and the place of public relations in the dominant coalition as contingencies impacting dialogue with contending publics.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 446
页数:16
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Cameron G. T., 2001, Journal of Communication Management, V5, P242, DOI 10.1108/13632540110806802
[2]  
CAMERON GT, 1997, P NORW INF SERV
[3]  
Cancel A.E., 1997, Journal of Public Relations Research, V9, P31, DOI DOI 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR0901_02
[4]   Testing the contingency theory of accommodation in public relations [J].
Cancel, AE ;
Mitrook, MA ;
Cameron, GT .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 1999, 25 (02) :171-197
[5]  
Dozier DM., 1995, Manager's Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management
[6]  
Fearn-Banks K., 1996, CRISIS COMMUNICATION
[7]  
Grunig J. E., 1992, EXCELLENCE PUBLIC RE
[8]  
Grunig J.E., 1984, Managing public relations
[9]  
GRUNIG JE, 1989, PUBLIC RELATIONS RES, V1, P31
[10]  
GRUNIG JE, 2001, HDB PUBLIC RELATIONS, P16