The European Society of Cardiology Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Survey II: A L updates comparison of cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation practice in Europe and France

被引:0
|
作者
Galand, Vincent [1 ]
Linde, Cecilia [2 ,3 ]
Lellouche, Nicolas [4 ]
Mansourati, Jacques [5 ]
Deharo, Jean-Claude [6 ]
Sagnol, Pascal [7 ]
Da Costa, Antoine [8 ]
Horvilleur, Jerome [9 ]
Defaye, Pascal [10 ]
Boveda, Serge [11 ]
Steinbach, Mathieu [12 ]
Bru, Paul [13 ]
Rumeau, Philippe [14 ]
Beard, Thierry [15 ]
Younsi, Salem [16 ]
Dickstein, Kenneth [17 ,18 ]
Normand, Camilla [18 ]
Leclercq, Christophe [19 ]
机构
[1] Rennes Univ, LTSI UMR 1099, CHU Rennes, F-35000 Rennes, France
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Heart & Vasc Theme, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Henri Mondor Hosp, F-94101 Creteil, France
[5] CHU Brest, Dept Cardiol, F-29200 Brest, France
[6] CHU Timone, Dept Cardiol, F-13385 Marseille, France
[7] Ctr Hosp William Morey, Dept Cardiol, F-71321 Chalon Sur Saone, France
[8] CHU St Etienne, Dept Cardiol, F-42270 St Priest En Jarez, France
[9] Paris South Cardiovasc Inst, Dept Cardiol, F-91300 Mossy, France
[10] Michallon Hosp, Dept Cardiol, CHU Grenoble Alpes, F-38700 La Tronche, France
[11] Clin Pasteur, Dept Cardiol, F-31076 Toulouse, France
[12] Ctr Hositalier Haguenau, Dept Cardiol, F-67500 Haguenau, France
[13] Ctr Hositalier Rochelle, Dept Cardiol, F-17019 La Rochelle, France
[14] Ctr Hositalier Albi, Dept Cardiol, F-81000 Albi, France
[15] Ormeau Polyclin, Dept Cardiol, F-65000 Tarbes, France
[16] Antoine Beclere Hosp, Dept Cardiol, F-92140 Clamart, France
[17] Stavanger Univ Hosp, Div Cardiol, N-4011 Stavanger, Norway
[18] Univ Bergen, Inst Internal Med, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[19] CHU Rennes, Dept Cardiol & Vasc Dis, 2 Rue Henri Le Guilloux, F-35000 Rennes, France
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Survey; Heart failure; Europe population; French population; HEART-FAILURE; ESC GUIDELINES; COMPLICATIONS; PREVENTION; OUTCOMES; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.acvd.2019.09.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. - The first European Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Survey, conducted in 2008-2009, showed considerable variations in guideline adherence and implantation practice. A second prospective survey (CRT Survey II) was then performed to describe contemporary clinical practice regarding CRT among 42 European countries. Aim. - To compare the characteristics of French CRT recipients with the overall population of CRT Survey II. Methods. - Demographic and procedural data from French centres recruiting all consecutive patients undergoing either de novo CRT implantation or an upgrade to a CRT system were collected and compared with data from the European population. Results. - A total of 11,088 patients were enrolled in CRT Survey II, 754 of whom were recruited in France. French patients were older (44.7% aged >= 75 years vs 31.1% in the European group), had less severe heart failure symptoms, a higher baseline left ventricular ejection fraction and fewer co-morbidities. Additionally, French patients had a shorter intrinsic QRS duration (19.1% had a QRS < 130 ms vs 12.3% in the European cohort). Successful implantation rates were similar, but procedural and fluoroscopy times were shorter in France. French patients were more likely to receive a CRT pacemaker than European patients overall. Of note, antibiotic prophylaxis was reported to be administered less frequently in France, and a higher rate of early device-related infection was observed. Importantly, French patients were less likely to receive optimal drugs for treating heart failure at hospital discharge. Conclusion. - This study highlights contemporary clinical practice in France, and describes sub- stantial differences in patient selection, implantation procedure and outcomes compared with the other European countries participating in CRT Survey II. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 722
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of current German and European practice in cardiac resynchronization therapy: lessons from the ESC/EHRA/HFA CRT Survey II
    Dennis Lawin
    Carsten W. Israel
    Cecilia Linde
    Camilla Normand
    Kenneth Dickstein
    Christiane Lober
    Anselm K. Gitt
    Gerhard Hindricks
    Christoph Stellbrink
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2020, 109 : 832 - 844
  • [22] Epicardial or transvenous leads: Controversial for the placement in implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Zhao, Zhi-Qiang
    Liu, Tong
    Zhu, Xiao-Tong
    Cui, Li
    Fan, Chong
    Zhang, Xiao-Wei
    Li, Guang-Ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 202 : 834 - 835
  • [23] Cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation: a blend of skill and technology
    Ritter, Philippe
    Cazeau, Serge
    Gras, Daniel
    Daubert, Jean-Claude
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 9 (0I) : I107 - I112
  • [24] 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Translation of the document prepared by the Czech Society of Cardiology
    Taborsky, Milos
    Kautzner, Josef
    Fedorco, Marian
    Curila, Karol
    Wunschova, Hanka
    Pyszko, Jan
    Novak, Miroslav
    Kozak, Milan
    Valek, Martin
    Polasek, Rostislav
    Keprt, Patrik
    Kubickova, Milena
    Plasek, Jiri
    Gloger, Vit
    Bulava, Alan
    Vancura, Vlastimil
    Skala, Tomas
    Parizek, Petr
    Danek, Josef
    COR ET VASA, 2022, 64 : 7 - 86
  • [25] Predictors of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT)
    Goldenberg, Ilan
    Moss, Arthur J.
    Hall, W. Jackson
    Foster, Elyse
    Goldberger, Jeffrey J.
    Santucci, Peter
    Shinn, Timothy
    Solomon, Scott
    Steinberg, Jonathan S.
    Wilber, David
    Barsheshet, Alon
    McNitt, Scott
    Zareba, Wojciech
    Klein, Helmut
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 124 (14) : 1527 - U94
  • [26] Cardiac resynchronization therapy and the role of nuclear cardiology
    Boogers M.M.
    Chen J.
    Bax J.J.
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, 2009, 2 (3) : 197 - 204
  • [27] Prevalence of true left bundle branch block in current practice of cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation
    Migliore, Federico
    Baritussio, Anna
    Stabile, Giuseppe
    Reggiani, Albino
    D'Onofrio, Antonio
    Palmisano, Pietro
    Caico, Salvatore Ivan
    De Simone, Antonio
    Marini, Massimiliano
    Pecora, Domenico
    Padeletti, Luigi
    Botto, Giovanni Luca
    Malacrida, Maurizio
    Bertaglia, Emanuele
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (07) : 462 - 468
  • [28] Comparison of measures of ventricular delay on cardiac resynchronization therapy response
    Field, Michael E.
    Yu, Nancy
    Wold, Nicholas
    Gold, Michael R.
    HEART RHYTHM, 2020, 17 (04) : 615 - 620
  • [29] Use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy: an Italian survey study on 220 cardiology departments
    Inama, Giuseppe
    Pedrinazzi, Claudio
    Landolina, Maurizio
    Oliva, Fabrizio
    Senni, Michele
    Proclemer, Alessandro
    Berisso, Massimo Zoni
    Pirelli, Salvatore
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2012, 13 (11) : 675 - 683
  • [30] The Influence of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on the Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)
    Kutyifa, Valentina
    Kloppe, Axel
    Zareba, Wojciech
    Solomon, Scott D.
    McNitt, Scott
    Polonsky, Slava
    Barsheshet, Alon
    Merkely, Bela
    Lemke, Bernd
    Nagy, Vivien Klaudia
    Moss, Arthur J.
    Goldenberg, Ilan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (09) : 936 - 944