Long-Lasting Enhancement of Visual Perception with Repetitive Noninvasive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

被引:18
|
作者
Behrens, Janina R. [1 ,2 ]
Kraft, Antje [3 ]
Irlbacher, Kerstin [4 ]
Gerhardt, Holger [5 ]
Olma, Manuel C. [1 ]
Brandt, Stephan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, NeuroCare Clin Res Ctr, Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Psychiat Univ Hosp St Hedwig, Dept Psychiat, Berlin, Germany
[4] MVZ Reinickendorf Berlin, Med Care Ctr, Berlin, Germany
[5] Rhein Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Bonn, Ctr Econ & Neurosci, Bonn, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE | 2017年 / 11卷
关键词
contrast sensitivity; noninvasive brain stimulation; plasticity; transcranial direct current stimulation; visual perceptual learning; primary visual cortex; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; CORTEX; MODULATION; PLASTICITY; CONTRAST; THRESHOLD; HUMANS; TDCS; V1;
D O I
10.3389/fncel.2017.00238
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Understanding processes performed by an intact visual cortex as the basis for developing methods that enhance or restore visual perception is of great interest to both researchers and medical practitioners. Here, we explore whether contrast sensitivity, a main function of the primary visual cortex (V1), can be improved in healthy subjects by repetitive, noninvasive anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Contrast perception was measured via threshold perimetry directly before and after intervention (tDCS or sham stimulation) on each day over 5 consecutive days (24 subjects, double-blind study). tDCS improved contrast sensitivity from the second day onwards, with significant effects lasting 24 h. After the last stimulation on day 5, the anodal group showed a significantly greater improvement in contrast perception than the sham group (23 vs. 5%). We found significant long-term effects in only the central 2-4 degrees of the visual field 4 weeks after the last stimulation. We suspect a combination of two factors contributes to these lasting effects. First, the V1 area that represents the central retina was located closer to the polarization electrode, resulting in higher current density. Second, the central visual field is represented by a larger cortical area relative to the peripheral visual field (cortical magnification). This is the first study showing that tDCS over V1 enhances contrast perception in healthy subjects for several weeks. This study contributes to the investigation of the causal relationship between the external modulation of neuronal membrane potential and behavior (in our case, visual perception). Because the vast majority of human studies only show temporary effects after single tDCS sessions targeting the visual system, our study underpins the potential for lasting effects of repetitive tDCS-induced modulation of neuronal excitability.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents
    Moliadze, Vera
    Schmanke, Till
    Andreas, Saskia
    Lyzhko, Ekaterina
    Freitag, Christine M.
    Siniatchkin, Michael
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 126 (07) : 1392 - 1399
  • [42] Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex
    Wiethoff, Sarah
    Hamada, Masashi
    Rothwell, John C.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2014, 7 (03) : 468 - 475
  • [43] Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Neuronal Functions
    Das, Suman
    Holland, Peter
    Frens, Maarten A.
    Donchin, Opher
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
  • [44] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Nicotine Use
    Gwon, Seok Hyun
    Lee, Han-Joo
    Brian Ahn, Hyochol
    JOURNAL OF ADDICTIONS NURSING, 2023, 34 (03) : E74 - E78
  • [45] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training
    Summers, Rebekah L. S.
    Chen, Mo
    Hatch, Andrea
    Kimberley, Teresa J.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [46] Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization
    Gillick, Bernadette T.
    Kirton, Adam
    Carmel, Jason B.
    Minhas, Preet
    Bikson, Marom
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [47] Can Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increase Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential Responses?
    Kim, Do-Won
    Kim, Euijin
    Lee, Chany
    Im, Chang Hwan
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 34 (43)
  • [48] Comparison of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Limb Recovery Among Patients With Recent Stroke
    Miu, Ka Ying Doris
    Kok, Ching
    Leung, Sau Shan
    Chan, Elaine Y. L.
    Wong, Elaine
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2020, 44 (06): : 428 - 437
  • [49] Combining TMS-EEG with transcranial direct current stimulation language treatment in aphasia
    Cipollari, Susanna
    Veniero, Domenica
    Razzano, Carmela
    Caltagirone, Carlo
    Koch, Giacomo
    Marangolo, Paola
    EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2015, 15 (07) : 833 - 845
  • [50] Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation
    Jamil, Asif
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Kuo, Hsiao-I.
    Labruna, Ludovica
    Hasan, Alkomiet
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2017, 595 (04): : 1273 - 1288