Long-Lasting Enhancement of Visual Perception with Repetitive Noninvasive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

被引:18
|
作者
Behrens, Janina R. [1 ,2 ]
Kraft, Antje [3 ]
Irlbacher, Kerstin [4 ]
Gerhardt, Holger [5 ]
Olma, Manuel C. [1 ]
Brandt, Stephan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, NeuroCare Clin Res Ctr, Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Psychiat Univ Hosp St Hedwig, Dept Psychiat, Berlin, Germany
[4] MVZ Reinickendorf Berlin, Med Care Ctr, Berlin, Germany
[5] Rhein Friedrich Wilhelms Univ Bonn, Ctr Econ & Neurosci, Bonn, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE | 2017年 / 11卷
关键词
contrast sensitivity; noninvasive brain stimulation; plasticity; transcranial direct current stimulation; visual perceptual learning; primary visual cortex; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; CORTEX; MODULATION; PLASTICITY; CONTRAST; THRESHOLD; HUMANS; TDCS; V1;
D O I
10.3389/fncel.2017.00238
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Understanding processes performed by an intact visual cortex as the basis for developing methods that enhance or restore visual perception is of great interest to both researchers and medical practitioners. Here, we explore whether contrast sensitivity, a main function of the primary visual cortex (V1), can be improved in healthy subjects by repetitive, noninvasive anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Contrast perception was measured via threshold perimetry directly before and after intervention (tDCS or sham stimulation) on each day over 5 consecutive days (24 subjects, double-blind study). tDCS improved contrast sensitivity from the second day onwards, with significant effects lasting 24 h. After the last stimulation on day 5, the anodal group showed a significantly greater improvement in contrast perception than the sham group (23 vs. 5%). We found significant long-term effects in only the central 2-4 degrees of the visual field 4 weeks after the last stimulation. We suspect a combination of two factors contributes to these lasting effects. First, the V1 area that represents the central retina was located closer to the polarization electrode, resulting in higher current density. Second, the central visual field is represented by a larger cortical area relative to the peripheral visual field (cortical magnification). This is the first study showing that tDCS over V1 enhances contrast perception in healthy subjects for several weeks. This study contributes to the investigation of the causal relationship between the external modulation of neuronal membrane potential and behavior (in our case, visual perception). Because the vast majority of human studies only show temporary effects after single tDCS sessions targeting the visual system, our study underpins the potential for lasting effects of repetitive tDCS-induced modulation of neuronal excitability.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in motor rehabilitation after stroke: An update
    Klomjai, W.
    Lackmy-Vallee, A.
    Roche, N.
    Pradat-Diehl, P.
    Marchand-Pauvert, V.
    Katz, R.
    ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2015, 58 (04) : 220 - 224
  • [22] Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry
    Antje Kraft
    Jasper Roehmel
    Manuel C. Olma
    Sein Schmidt
    Kerstin Irlbacher
    Stephan A. Brandt
    Experimental Brain Research, 2010, 207 : 283 - 290
  • [23] Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Labruna, Ludovica
    Jamil, Asif
    Fresnoza, Shane
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Vanderschelden, Benjamin
    Ivry, Richard B.
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2016, 9 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [24] Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in focal hand dystonia: Systematic review of intervention trials
    Menon, Vikas
    Varadharajan, Natarajan
    Bascarane, Sharmi
    Andrade, Chittaranjan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 80
  • [25] Evidence that some long-lasting effects of direct current in the rat spinal cord are activity-independent
    Jankowska, Elzbieta
    Kaczmarek, Dominik
    Bolzoni, Francesco
    Hammar, Ingela
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 43 (10) : 1400 - 1411
  • [26] Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery
    Schlaug, Gottfried
    Renga, Vijay
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2008, 5 (06) : 759 - 768
  • [27] The effects of medication use in transcranial direct current stimulation: A brief review
    McLaren, Molly E.
    Nissim, Nicole R.
    Woods, Adam J.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (01) : 52 - 58
  • [28] Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for Treatment-Resistant Depression Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Boscutti, Andrea
    De Figueiredo, Juliana Mendonca
    Razouq, Dana
    Murphy, Nicholas
    Cho, Raymond
    Selvaraj, Sudhakar
    PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 46 (02) : 307 - 329
  • [29] Transcranial direct current stimulation treatment
    Eryilmaz, Gul
    Erkmen, Husnu
    Gotgcegtoz Gul, Isil
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 16 (02): : 138 - 142
  • [30] The effects of combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function in patients with stroke
    Kwon, Tae Gun
    Park, Eunhee
    Kang, Chung
    Chang, Won Hyuk
    Kim, Yun-Hee
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 34 (06) : 915 - 923