Institutional review board challenges related to community-based participatory research on human exposure to environmental toxins: A case study

被引:62
作者
Brown, Phil [3 ,4 ]
Morello-Frosch, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Brody, J. G. [5 ]
Altman, Rebecca Gasior [6 ]
Rudel, Ruthann A. [5 ]
Senier, Laura [7 ,8 ]
Perez, Carla [9 ]
Simpson, Ruth [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Dept Sociol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Ctr Environm Studies, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[5] Silent Spring Inst, Newton, MA 02458 USA
[6] Tufts Univ, Dept Community Hlth, Medford, MA 02555 USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Family Med, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Rural Sociol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[9] Communities Better Environm, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[10] Bryn Mawr Coll, Dept Sociol, Rosemont, PA 19010 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; PUBLIC-HEALTH; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1186/1476-069X-9-39
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: We report on the challenges of obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) coverage for a community-based participatory research (CBPR) environmental justice project, which involved reporting biomonitoring and household exposure results to participants, and included lay participation in research. Methods: We draw on our experiences guiding a multi-partner CBPR project through university and state Institutional Review Board reviews, and other CBPR colleagues' written accounts and conference presentations and discussions. We also interviewed academics involved in CBPR to learn of their challenges with Institutional Review Boards. Results: We found that Institutional Review Boards are generally unfamiliar with CBPR, reluctant to oversee community partners, and resistant to ongoing researcher-participant interaction. Institutional Review Boards sometimes unintentionally violate the very principles of beneficence and justice which they are supposed to uphold. For example, some Institutional Review Boards refuse to allow report-back of individual data to participants, which contradicts the CBPR principles that guide a growing number of projects. This causes significant delays and may divert research and dissemination efforts. Our extensive education of our university Institutional Review Board convinced them to provide human subjects protection coverage for two community-based organizations in our partnership. Conclusions: IRBs and funders should develop clear, routine review guidelines that respect the unique qualities of CBPR, while researchers and community partners can educate IRB staff and board members about the objectives, ethical frameworks, and research methods of CBPR. These strategies can better protect research participants from the harm of unnecessary delays and exclusion from the research process, while facilitating the ethical communication of study results to participants and communities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, RES INV HUM BIOL MAT
[2]  
[Anonymous], BODYBURDEN POLL PEOP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1978, The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research
[4]  
BISHOP R, 1994, NEW ZEAL J EDUC STUD, V29, P175
[5]  
Blum A, 2007, SCIENCE, V318, P194
[6]   Bureaucracies of mass deception: Institutional review boards and the ethics of ethnographic research [J].
Bosk, CL ;
De Vries, RG .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2004, 595 :249-263
[7]   Is it safe?: New ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals [J].
Brody, Julia Green ;
Morello-Frosch, Rachel ;
Brown, Phil ;
Rudel, Ruthann A. ;
Altman, Rebecca Gasior ;
Frye, Margaret ;
Osimo, Cheryl A. ;
Perez, Carla ;
Seryalk, Liesel M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 97 (09) :1547-1554
[8]  
Brody Julia Green, 2009, Am J Public Health, V99 Suppl 3, pS600, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2008.149088
[9]   Financial relationships between institutional review board members and industry [J].
Campbell, Eric G. ;
Weissman, Joel S. ;
Vogeli, Christine ;
Clarridge, Brian R. ;
Abraham, Melissa ;
Marder, Jessica E. ;
Koski, Greg .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (22) :2321-2329
[10]   DDT and breast cancer in young women: new data on the significance of age at exposure [J].
Cohn, Barbara A. ;
Wolff, Mary S. ;
Cirillo, Piera M. ;
Sholtz, Robert I. .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 115 (10) :1406-1414