Collective Decision-Making and the Economic Vote

被引:6
作者
Duch, Raymond M. [1 ]
Falco-Gimeno, Albert [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Coll, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Barcelona, Polit Sci, Av Diagonal 684, Barcelona 08034, Spain
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
coalition governments; economic vote; compartmentalization; proposal power; finance minister; experiments; COALITION GOVERNMENTS EVIDENCE; MINISTERIAL AUTONOMY; RESPONSIBILITY; PERCEPTIONS; SURVIVAL; INSTITUTIONS; ATTRIBUTION; VIGNETTE; PARTIES; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1177/00104140211036045
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Experimental evidence suggests that decision makers with proposal power are held responsible for collective decisions. In the case of coalition governments, voter heuristics assign responsibility for economic outcomes to individual parties, directing the economic vote toward the Prime Minister party. Using extensive survey data from 1988 to 2010 in 28 democracies, we demonstrate that voters also identify the Finance Minister party as responsible depending on whether the coalition context exaggerates or mutes its perceived agenda power. When parties take ownership for particular policy areas, and decision-making is compartmentalized, voters perceive the Finance Minister as having proposal power and it receives a larger economic vote. Online survey experiments in Ireland and the Netherlands confirm that subjects employ compartmentalization signals to identify, and punish, coalition parties with proposal power.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 788
页数:32
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Economic voting and political context: a comparative perspective
    Anderson, CJ
    [J]. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2000, 19 (2-3) : 151 - 170
  • [2] Responsibility attribution in coalition governments: Evidence from Germany
    Angelova, Mariyana
    Koenig, Thomas
    Proksch, Sven-Oliver
    [J]. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2016, 43 : 133 - 149
  • [3] Who gets what in coalition governments? Predictors of portfolio allocation in parliamentary democracies
    Baeck, Hanna
    Debus, Marc
    Dumont, Patrick
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 50 (04) : 441 - 478
  • [4] Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty
    Baker, Scott R.
    Bloom, Nicholas
    Davis, Steven J.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) : 1593 - 1636
  • [5] Are Poor Voters Indifferent to Whether Elected Leaders Are Criminal or Corrupt? A Vignette Experiment in Rural India
    Banerjee, Abhijit
    Green, Donald P.
    McManus, Jeffery
    Pande, Rohini
    [J]. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2014, 31 (03) : 391 - 407
  • [6] Coalition-Targeted Duvergerian Voting: How Expectations Affect Voter Choice under Proportional Representation
    Bargsted, Matias A.
    Kedar, Orit
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 53 (02) : 307 - 323
  • [7] Economic outlook database
    Bawn, K
    Rosenbluth, F
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 50 (02) : 251 - 265
  • [8] Norms versus Action: Why Voters Fail to Sanction Malfeasance in Brazil
    Boas, Taylor C.
    Hidalgo, F. Daniel
    Melo, Marcus Andre
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 63 (02) : 385 - 400
  • [9] How much is majority status in the US Congress worth?
    Cox, GW
    Magar, E
    [J]. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1999, 93 (02) : 299 - 309
  • [10] Information Equivalence in Survey Experiments
    Dafoe, Allan
    Zhang, Baobao
    Caughey, Devin
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 26 (04) : 399 - 416