Effects of Anterior Plating on Achieving Clinically Meaningful Improvement Following Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

被引:6
作者
Lynch, Conor P. [1 ]
Cha, Elliot D. K. [1 ]
Patel, Madhav R. [1 ]
Jadczak, Caroline N. [1 ]
Mohan, Shruthi [1 ]
Geoghegan, Cara E. [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1611 W Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Cervical vertebrae; Spinal fusion; Visual analogue scale; Patient-reported out-come measures; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; STAND-ALONE CAGES; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; INTERBODY FUSION; FIXATION;
D O I
10.14245/ns.2142214.107
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The clinical utility of anterior cervical plating for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures remains controversial. This study aims to compare the impact of cervical plating on achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) up to 2 years following ACDF. Methods: Patients undergoing primary, single-level ACDF procedures were grouped based on whether their procedure included application of an anterior cervical plate. Demographics, preoperative spinal diagnoses, operative characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between plating groups. Achievement of an MCID was assessed using the following previously established thresholds: 12-item Short Form health survey physical component summary (SF-12 PCS) 8.1, visual analogue scale (VAS) neck 2.6, VAS arm 4.1, Neck Disability Index (NDI) 8.5. Rates of MCID achievement were compared between groups. Results: The cohort included 192 patients of whom 102 received plating and 90 received no plating. Plating status was significantly associated with Charlson Comorbidity Index and insurance status. Operative duration and estimated blood loss were significantly greater for the plating group. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements at the majority of postoperative timepoints. Significant intergroup differences in PROM improvement were demonstrated for VAS neck and NDI at 6 weeks. Rates of MCID achievement differed significantly between groups for NDI at 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, and SF-12 PCS overall. Conclusion: Patients improved significantly in terms of pain, disability and physical function, regardless of plating status, and with the exception of early neck pain and disability, these improvements were similar between groups. Patients that underwent plating as part of their ACDF procedure achieved an MCID for physical function at lower rates overall.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 322
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient-Reported Satisfaction After Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy [J].
Andresen, Andreas Kiilerich ;
Paulsen, Rune Tendal ;
Busch, Frederik ;
Isenberg-Jorgensen, Alexander ;
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Andersen, Mikkel O. .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (07) :703-708
[2]   How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure [J].
Brozek, Jan L. ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2006, 4 (1)
[3]   Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients [J].
Cauthen, JC ;
Kinard, RE ;
Vogler, JB ;
Jackson, DE ;
DePaz, OB ;
Hunter, OL ;
Wasserburger, LB ;
Williams, VM .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (02) :188-192
[4]   Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between zero-profile implant and cages with plate fixation in treating multilevel cervical spondilotic myelopathy: A three-year follow-up [J].
Chen, Yu ;
Chen, Huajiang ;
Wu, Xiaodong ;
Wang, Xinwei ;
Lin, Wenbo ;
Yuan, Wen .
CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 144 :72-76
[5]   Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With a Stand-Alone Interbody Cage Versus a Conventional Cage-Plate Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Cheung, Zoe B. ;
Gidumal, Sunder ;
White, Samuel ;
Shin, John ;
Phan, Kevin ;
Osman, Nebiyu ;
Bronheim, Rachel ;
Vargas, Luilly ;
Kim, Jun S. ;
Cho, Samuel K. .
GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (04) :446-455
[6]   Patient-Specific Factors Associated With Dissatisfaction After Elective Surgery for Degenerative Spine Diseases [J].
Chotai, Silky ;
Sivaganesan, Ahilan ;
Parker, Scott L. ;
McGirt, Matthew J. ;
Devin, Clinton J. .
NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 77 (02) :157-163
[7]   Comparison of the outcomes of cage-stand-alone with cage-with-plate fixation in one level and two levels for treating cervical disk diseases [J].
Etemadifar, Mohammadreza ;
Andalib, Ali ;
Shafiee, Hossein ;
Samani, Milad Kabiri .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2018, 9 (03) :170-174
[8]  
Goldberg Edward J, 2002, Spine J, V2, P408, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00441-2
[9]   A Prospective Study with Cage-Only or Cage-with-Plate Fixation in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion of One and Two Levels [J].
Kim, Sam Yeol ;
Yoon, Seung Hwan ;
Kim, Dokeun ;
Oh, Chang Hyun ;
Oh, Seyang .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 60 (06) :691-700
[10]   Analysis of Associating Factors With C2-7 Sagittal Vertical Axis After Two-level Anterior Cervical Fusion Comparison Between Plate Augmentation and Stand-alone Cages [J].
Kwon, Woo-Keun ;
Kim, Pyeong Soo ;
Ahn, Seong Yong ;
Song, Jye Young ;
Kim, Joo Han ;
Park, Youn-Kwan ;
Kwon, Taek-Hyun ;
Moon, Hong Joo .
SPINE, 2017, 42 (05) :318-325