Correction of helical CT attenuation values with wide beam collimation: In vitro test with urinary calculi

被引:12
作者
Williams, JC
Saw, KC
Monga, AG
Chua, GT
Lingeman, JE
McAteer, JA
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Methodist Hosp, Inst Kidney Stone Dis, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Methodist Hosp, Dept Radiol, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
spiral CT; volume averaging error; modeling; urolithiasis;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80619-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. Urinary calculi are now commonly detected with helical computed tomography (CT), and it has been proposed that stone composition can be determined from CT attenuation values, However, typical scans are made with a beam collimation of 5 mm or more, resulting in volume averaging and reduction in accuracy of attenuation measurement. The authors tested a model for correction of errors in attenuation values, even at section widths larger than the width of the object. Materials and Methods. Human urinary stones were scanned with helical CT at different beam collimation widths. A computer model was used to predict the effect of beam width and stone size on accuracy of measured attenuation. Results. At 3-mm collimation, the model corrected the attenuation readings with an underestimation of 12% +/- 1 (com pared with values at I-mm collimation: 127 stones; diameters of 1.7-11.3 mm). With attenuation measured at 10-mm collimation, the model underestimated the true value by 34% +/- 3 (103 stones), with a significant negative correlation with stone diameter on magnitude of error (diameters of 3.0-11.3 mm), Correlation of data from patient scans with subsequent in vitro scanning of the same stones confirmed the validity of the model, but corrected in vivo scans consistently yielded lower values for the stones than in vitro. Conclusion. Volume averaging effects on attenuation in helical CT are predictable in vitro for urinary calculi-and presumably for other roughly spherical structures-as long as section width does not excessively exceed the diameter of the structure.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 483
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain
    Dalrymple, NC
    Verga, M
    Anderson, KR
    Bove, P
    Covey, AM
    Rosenfield, AT
    Smith, RC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) : 735 - 740
  • [2] Helical CT of the urinary tract
    Fielding, JR
    Silverman, SG
    Rubin, GD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (05) : 1199 - 1206
  • [3] Spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain: A replacement for excretory urography
    Fielding, JR
    Steele, G
    Fox, LA
    Heller, H
    Loughlin, KR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (06) : 2071 - 2073
  • [4] COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF RENAL CALCULI
    HILLMAN, BJ
    DRACH, GW
    TRACEY, P
    GAINES, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1984, 142 (03) : 549 - 552
  • [5] The effect of helical pitch and beam collimation on the lesion contrast and slice profile in helical CT imaging
    Hu, H
    Fox, SH
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (12) : 1943 - 1954
  • [6] KUWAHARA M, 1984, UROL RES, V12, P111
  • [7] DETERMINATION OF THE CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION OF URINARY CALCULI BY COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY
    MITCHESON, HD
    ZAMENHOF, RG
    BANKOFF, MS
    PRIEN, EL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 130 (04) : 814 - 819
  • [8] Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography
    Mostafavi, MR
    Ernst, RD
    Saltzman, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) : 673 - 675
  • [9] Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting
    Nakada, SY
    Hoff, DG
    Attai, S
    Heisey, D
    Blankenbaker, D
    Pozniak, M
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2000, 55 (06) : 816 - 819
  • [10] COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF URINARY CALCULI
    NEWHOUSE, JH
    PRIEN, EL
    AMIS, ES
    DRETLER, SP
    PFISTER, RC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1984, 142 (03) : 545 - 548