Responsiveness of the Brazilian IdFAI questionnaire in patients with chronic ankle instability

被引:1
作者
Martinez, Bruna [1 ]
Sauers, Andrea [1 ]
da Conceicao Souza, Vitoria [1 ]
de Oliveira, Juliana [1 ]
Yi, Liu Chiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Human Movement Sci, Ana Costa Ave 95, Santos, SP, Brazil
关键词
Ankle sprain; patient reported outcome measures; questionnaires; treatment outcome; validation studies; MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; POSTURAL CONTROL; RELIABILITY; VERSION; IDENTIFICATION; STRENGTH; DEFICITS; CRITERIA; SPRAINS;
D O I
10.1080/09593985.2021.1975336
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose This study aimed to determine the responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) questionnaire in students who received an eight-week treatment for chronic ankle instability (CAI). Methods Twenty-five college students (aged 23.12 +/- 2.80 years) with CAI, as identified by the IdFAI questionnaire, were recruited. We used distribution and anchor-based methods to assess the responsiveness of the questionnaire, and its ability to determine clinical changes in participants. Eleven anchors were used: Visual Analog Scale for instability (VAS-i); Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT); Isometric dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, inversion, and eversion muscle strength measured using a manual dynamometer; Dynamic balance as assessed through the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT-Y); Active ankle dorsiflexion range of motion as measured using the weight-bearing lunge test; and Functional performance assessment using three hop tests: single hop, triple crossover hop, and side hop. The distribution-based method used effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM), whereas the anchor-based method used paired t-tests. Both methods allowed the calculation of the minimal important difference (MID). Results The Brazilian IdFAI showed high responsiveness, with a large magnitude of change (ES = 1.34) and a high responsiveness index (SRM = 1.28) when assessed after a treatment for CAI. The IdFAI total score (p < .001) and all the 11 anchors [VAS-i (p < .001); CAIT (p < .001); Isometric dorsiflexion (p < .001), plantar flexion (p < .001), inversion (p < .001), and eversion (p < .001) muscle strength; SEBT-Y (p < .001); Lunge test (p = .002); Single hop (p < .001); triple crossover hop (p < .001); and side hop tests (p < .001)] showed significant differences. The anchor and distribution-based methods demonstrated MID values of 3.72 and 1.49-2.27, respectively. Conclusion The Brazilian IdFAI questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure sensitive to clinical changes in individuals with CAI. It can be used as an identification of patients with CAI, and as a parameter to verify clinical changes of clinical trials or therapeutic interventions in the population with CAI.
引用
收藏
页码:3045 / 3054
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Bennell Kim L, 1998, Aust J Physiother, V44, P175
  • [2] Reliability of lower extremity functional performance tests
    Bolgla, LA
    Keskula, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1997, 26 (03) : 138 - 142
  • [3] The Ability of 4 Single-Limb Hopping Tests to Detect Functional Performance Deficits in Individuals With Functional Ankle Instability
    Caffrey, Erin
    Docherty, Carrie L.
    Schrader, John
    Klossner, Joanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2009, 39 (11) : 799 - 806
  • [4] Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Bushmakin, Andrew G.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (05) : 460 - 483
  • [5] Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability questionnaire (IdFAI-Sp)
    Cervera-Garvi, Pablo
    Belen Ortega-Avila, Ana
    Marchena-Rodriguez, Ana
    Gijon-Nogueron, Gabriel
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (13) : 3221 - 3227
  • [6] Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, P75
  • [7] Silva APDCCE, 2014, INT J SPORTS PHYS TH, V9, P628
  • [8] Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)
    De Noronha, Marcos
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    Kilbreath, Sharon L.
    Figueiredo, Vitor G.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 30 (26) : 1959 - 1965
  • [9] Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    van der Roer, Nicole
    Knol, Dirk L.
    Beckerman, Heleen
    Boers, Maarten
    Bouter, Lex M.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (01) : 131 - 142
  • [10] Docherty CL, 2005, J ATHL TRAINING, V40, P30