How can students succeed in computer-supported interprofessional team-based learning? Understanding the underlying psychological pathways using Biggs' 3P model

被引:12
作者
Ganotice, Fraide A., Jr. [1 ]
Chan, Lap Ki [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Shue Yan Univ, Dept Counseling & Psychol, Room 225,LG2 Acad Bldg,10 Wai Tsui Crescent, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Konge, Li Ka Shing Fac Med, Sch Biomed Sci, Bau Inst Hlth Sci Educ, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Team-based learning; Computer-supported instruction; Interprofessional education; Mediational analysis; ACHIEVEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; READINESS; IMPACT; ONLINE; STRATEGIES; MOTIVATION; ANATOMY; FORMAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.029
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Adopting Biggs' (2003) 3P (presage, process, product) model, this study examined the role of individual preparedness, member's contribution, motivation, enjoyment in students' learning, readiness for interprofessional learning, and attainment of desired outcomes in the context of computer-supported interprofessional team-based learning (CS-IPTBL). A sample of 531 health and social care students (Chinese medicine, medicine, nursing, pharmacy, occupational therapy, and social work) from two universities in Hong Kong participated in the study. Mediational analysis showed that task value (motivation and enjoyment) and utility (perceived usefulness) played a significant mediating role between perceived preparedness and perceived individual contribution and outcomes. The study enriched the extant research by showing possible pathways that determined students' achievement in CS-IPTBL. Findings suggest that students' achievement (product) in CS-IPTBL is influenced by their motivation, enjoyment, and perceived usefulness (process) which were derived from two sources: individual preparedness and members' valuable contribution (presage). Key findings and their implications for program enhancement and teaching are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 219
页数:9
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, Team-based learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Framework for Action on Inter-professional Education and Collaborative Practice
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2003, Aligning teaching for constructing learning
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1987, Student approaches to Learning and studing
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design analysis issues for field settings
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1994, EXCEPTIONALITY, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327035EX0503_2
  • [8] Use of technology in the readiness assurance process of team based learning: Paper, automated response system, or computer based testing
    Antoun, Jumana
    Nasr, Rihab
    Zgheib, Nathalie K.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 46 : 38 - 44
  • [9] Comparing the efficacy of team based learning strategies in a problem based learning curriculum
    Anwar, Khurshid
    Shaikh, Abdul Ahad
    Dash, Nihar Ranjan
    Khurshid, Saqib
    [J]. APMIS, 2012, 120 (09) : 718 - 723
  • [10] The social fabric of a team-based MBA Program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance
    Baldwin, TT
    Bedell, MD
    Johnson, JL
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1997, 40 (06) : 1369 - 1397