A study of proximal esophageal baseline impedance in identifying and predicting laryngopharyngeal reflux

被引:15
作者
Chen, Songfeng [1 ]
Liang, Mengya [2 ]
Zhang, Mengyu [1 ]
Tan, Niandi [1 ]
Lin, Yuqing [1 ]
Cao, Peixian [1 ]
Xiao, Yinglian [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou 510080, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Cardiac Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou 510080, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Baseline impedance; Laryngopharyngeal reflux; Manometry; pH-impedance monitoring; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; ACID; GERD; PREVALENCE; THERAPY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/jgh.14998
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is caused by the reflux of gastric contents beyond the esophagus into the larynx and pharynx. However, upper esophageal sphincter (UES) motility and proximal esophagus reflux parameters are poorly studied. This study aims to explore the characteristics of UES motility and reflux parameter among LPR patients. Methods Patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms only (L), patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms and typical esophageal symptoms (L + E), patients with typical esophageal symptoms only (E), and healthy controls (H) were retrospectively included. Physiological profiles were studied and compared among groups using both high-resolution manometry and pH-impedance monitoring, including UES basal pressure, residual pressure, relaxation duration time, recovery time, the time to nadir pressure, UES length, proximal contractile integral, and proximal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI). Patients' symptom outcomes were also analyzed. Results A total of 242 patients were included. Proximal MNBI was significantly lower in patients with both laryngopharyngeal and esophageal symptoms (17 cm above low esophageal sphincter [LES]: L vs L + E vs E vs H = 3689.7 vs 2500.0 vs 3073.0 vs 3996.0; 15 cm above LES: L vs L + E vs E vs H = 3155.9 vs 2553.4 vs 3198.9 vs 2985.2; P < 0.001). Patients responded to proton pump inhibitor treatment also had lower proximal MNBI than those who did not (17 cm above LES: 1834.0 vs 3500.0; 15 cm above LES: 1946.5 vs 3432.6; P < 0.001). Conclusion Decreased proximal MNBI can not only identify LPR patients but also predict patients' symptom outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1509 / 1514
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Mucosal Impedance Discriminates GERD From Non-GERD Conditions
    Ates, Fehmi
    Yuksel, Elif Saritas
    Higginbotham, Tina
    Slaughter, James C.
    Mabary, Jerry
    Kavitt, Robert T.
    Garrett, C. Gaelyn
    Francis, David
    Vaezi, Michael F.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 148 (02) : 334 - 343
  • [2] Chen X M, 2016, Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi, V51, P909, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2016.12.006
  • [3] Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review
    El-Serag, Hashem B.
    Sweet, Stephen
    Winchester, Christopher C.
    Dent, John
    [J]. GUT, 2014, 63 (06) : 871 - 880
  • [4] Esophageal chemical clearance is impaired in gastro-esophageal reflux disease a 24-h impedance-pH monitoring assessment
    Frazzoni, M.
    Manta, R.
    Mirante, V. G.
    Conigliaro, R.
    Frazzoni, L.
    Melotti, G.
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2013, 25 (05) : 399 - e295
  • [5] Analyses of the Post-reflux Swallow-induced Peristaltic Wave Index and Nocturnal Baseline Impedance Parameters Increase the Diagnostic Yield of Impedance-pH Monitoring of Patients With Reflux Disease
    Frazzoni, Marzio
    Savarino, Edoardo
    de Bortoli, Nicola
    Martinucci, Irene
    Furnari, Manuele
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Mirante, Vincenzo Giorgio
    Bertani, Helga
    Marchi, Santino
    Conigliaro, Rita
    Savarinok, Vincenzo
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 14 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [6] Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus
    Gyawali, C. Prakash
    Kahrilas, Peter J.
    Savarino, Edoardo
    Zerbib, Frank
    Mion, Francois
    Smout, Andre J. P. M.
    Vaezi, Michael
    Sifrim, Daniel
    Fox, Mark R.
    Vela, Marcelo F.
    Tutuian, Radu
    Tack, Jan
    Bredenoord, Albert J.
    Pandolfino, John
    Roman, Sabine
    [J]. GUT, 2018, 67 (07) : 1351 - 1362
  • [7] The prevalence of hypopharynx findings associated with gastroesophageal reflux in normal volunteers
    Hicks, DM
    Ours, TM
    Abelson, TI
    Vaezi, MF
    Richter, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2002, 16 (04) : 564 - 579
  • [8] How Much Pharyngeal Exposure Is "Normal"? Normative Data for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Events Using Hypopharyngeal Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance (HMII)
    Hoppo, Toshitaka
    Sanz, Alejandro F.
    Nason, Katie S.
    Carroll, Thomas L.
    Rosen, Clark
    Normolle, Daniel P.
    Shaheen, Nicholas J.
    Luketich, James D.
    Jobe, Blair A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2012, 16 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [9] Upper esophageal sphincter augmentation reduces pharyngeal reflux in nasogastric tube-fed patients
    Jiao, Hongmei
    Mei, Ling
    Liang, Chenyang
    Dai, Yun
    Fu, Zhifang
    Wu, Lihong
    Sanvanson, Patrick
    Shaker, Reza
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2018, 128 (06) : 1310 - 1315
  • [10] Esophageal Acid Exposure Decreases Intraluminal Baseline Impedance Levels
    Kessing, Boudewijn F.
    Bredenoord, Albert J.
    Weijenborg, Pim W.
    Hemmink, Gerrit J. M.
    Loots, Clara M.
    Smout, A. J. P. M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 106 (12) : 2093 - 2097