Analysis of agricultural sustainability: A review of exergy methodologies and their application in OECD countries

被引:26
作者
Hoang, Viet-Ngu [1 ]
Alauddin, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Econ, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
agricultural production; agricultural sustainability; exergy analysis; eco-environmental performance; OECD agriculture; sustainability indicators; RESOURCE ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; SOIL-EROSION; NORWEGIAN SOCIETY; ENERGY-RESOURCES; EMERGY ANALYSIS; LAND-USE; PART; EFFICIENCY; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1002/er.1713
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This article proposed the combination of cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment and extended exergy analysis to analyse international environmental performance in agricultural production. The unified approach allowed the cumulative analysis of total extraction of all types of resources and services from the ecosystem in agriculture. The analysis, therefore, enabled a more accurate comparison of the environmental performance of different countries or systems based on different indicators of sustainability. The application was conducted for 29 OECD countries for the years from 1990 to 2003 with some important findings. First, the organic contents in topsoil, feed and total water withdrawal were the three types of resources that agricultural production extracted most from the environment. Second, during the 14 years surveyed, the efficiency of using exergy in the livestock sector was much lower than the efficiency in the crop sector. Third, the environmental loading of economic investment had increased slightly, implying a minor increase in the pressure on the environment overtime. In addition, the empirical study on OECD countries confirmed that rankings varied widely based on different indicators. The empirical results gave some evidence to support the use of non-renewability yield ratio, firstly defined in this paper, because the rankings based on this indicator was more consistent with many other indicators. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 476
页数:18
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
*AFRIS, 2009, AN FEED RES INF SYST
[2]   Analysis of energy and exergy utilisation of Jordan's agricultural sector [J].
Al-Ghandoor, Ahmed ;
Jaber, Jamal Othman .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2009, 6 (04) :491-508
[3]   Quantifying the quality loss and resource efficiency of recycling by means of exergy analysis [J].
Amini, S. H. ;
Remmerswaal, J. A. M. ;
Castro, M. B. ;
Reuter, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (10) :907-913
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ScienceDaily
[5]  
[Anonymous], EUR WORKSH EFF PROD
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Environmental Performance of Agriculture in OECD Countries since 1990.
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, USDA NAT NUTR DAT ST
[8]  
[Anonymous], ENCY ECOLOGY
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1973, REV INCOME WEALTH
[10]   Soil erosion and land use policy in Iceland in relation to sheep grazing and government subsidies [J].
Arnalds, O ;
Barkarson, BH .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2003, 6 (01) :105-113