Occupational dose to the radiographer in dual X-ray absorptiometry: A comparison of pencil-beam and fan-beam systems

被引:27
作者
Patel, R [1 ]
Blake, GM [1 ]
Batchelor, S [1 ]
Fogelman, I [1 ]
机构
[1] ST THOMAS HOSP,DEPT MED PHYS,LONDON SE1 7TH,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1259/0007-1285-69-822-539
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The introduction of advanced dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners with fan-beam geometry, improved image definition and faster scan times raises the question as to whether there is a significant radiation dose to the radiographer. We have measured the radiation dose to the operator from studies performed on four DXA systems; the Lunar DPX, Hologic QDR-1000, QDR-2000plus and QDR-4500. The results were compared with the radiographer dose from Tc-99(m)-MDP radionuclide bone scanning, where it is not usual to use a radiation barrier between the patient and the operator, and F-18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) scanning where it is usual to protect staff. Ambient dose equivalent rate averaged over 1 h at 1 m from the patient with the DXA systems working at maximum patient throughput were 0.012, 0.12, 2.1 and 2.4 mu Sv h(-1), respectively, for the DPX, QDR-1000, QDR-2000plus and QDR-4500. Annual operator dose for the DPX and QDR-1000 was well below the 1 mSv limit for members of the public recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (1990). Results for the QDR-2000plus and QDR-4500 were similar to a radionuclide bone scan (2.2 mu Sv h(-1)), but smaller than for a PET scan (8.9 mu Sv h(-1)), and were close to the 5 mSv year(-1) limit for a supervised area defined in the 1985 Ionising Radiation Regulations. Precautions to reduce radiographer dose with fan beam DXA include placing the operator at least 2 m from the patient, scanning the right hip instead of the left and using scan modes with short scanning times.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 543
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN FAN-BEAM AND PENCIL BEAM SCANS
    BLAKE, GM
    PARKER, JC
    BUXTON, FMA
    FOGELMAN, I
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1993, 66 (790) : 902 - 906
  • [2] X-RAY DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY - A NEW METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF BONE-DENSITY
    CULLUM, ID
    ELL, PJ
    RYDER, JP
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1989, 62 (739) : 587 - 592
  • [3] FUERST T, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, pS370
  • [4] HANSON JA, 1995, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V5, P287
  • [5] *ICRP, 1990, PUBL ANN ICRP, V60
  • [6] *INT COMM RAD PROT, 1977, PUBL ANN ICRP, V26
  • [7] COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE INVITRO AND INVIVO OF LUNAR DPX AND HOLOGIC QDR-1000 DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETERS
    LASKEY, MA
    FLAXMAN, ME
    BARBER, RW
    TRAFFORD, S
    HAYBALL, MP
    LYTTLE, KD
    CRISP, AJ
    COMPSTON, JE
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (767) : 1023 - 1029
  • [8] PATIENT DOSE IN DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    LEWIS, MK
    BLAKE, GM
    FOGELMAN, I
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 4 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [9] LEWIS MK, 1996, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V6, P97
  • [10] Radiological assessment of a new bone densitometer - The Lunar EXPERT
    Njeh, CF
    Apple, K
    Temperton, DH
    Boivin, CM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1996, 69 (820) : 335 - 340