Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Analysis Based on Metabolic Gene Classification and Immunotherapy

被引:7
作者
Zhou, Yu [1 ]
Che, Yingqi [2 ]
Fu, Zhongze [3 ]
Zhang, Henan [1 ]
Wu, Huiyu [4 ]
机构
[1] Jiamusi Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Oncol Dept, Jiamusi, Peoples R China
[2] Long Nan Hosp, Hematol Oncol Dept, Daqing, Peoples R China
[3] First Hosp Qiqihar, Gastroenterol Dept, Qiqihar, Peoples R China
[4] Peoples Hosp Daqing, Dept Oncol 3, Daqing, Peoples R China
关键词
triple-negative breast cancer; metabolic genes; bioinformatics; molecular typing; tumor microenvironment; immunotherapy; SIGNALING PATHWAYS; EXPRESSION; RECEPTOR; BIOMARKERS; HALLMARKS; SUBTYPES; SUBSETS; CELLS;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.902378
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has negative expression of ER, PR and HER-2. TNBC shows high histological grade and positive rate of lymph node metastasis, easy recurrence and distant metastasis. Molecular typing based on metabolic genes can reflect deeper characteristics of breast cancer and provide support for prognostic evaluation and individualized treatment. Metabolic subtypes of TNBC samples based on metabolic genes were determined by consensus clustering. CIBERSORT method was applied to evaluate the score distribution and differential expression of 22 immune cells in the TNBC samples. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) established a subtype classification feature index. Kaplan-Meier (KM) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to validate the performance of prognostic metabolic subtypes in different datasets. Finally, we used weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to cluster the TCGA expression profile dataset and screen the co-expression modules of metabolic genes. Consensus clustering of the TCGA cohort/dataset obtained three metabolic subtypes (MC1, MC2, and MC3). The ROC analysis showed a high prognostic performance of the three clusters in different datasets. Specifically, MC1 had the optimal prognosis, MC3 had a poor prognosis, and the three metabolic subtypes had different prognosis. Consistently, the immune characteristic index established based on metabolic subtypes demonstrated that compared with the other two subtypes, MC1 had a higher IFN gamma score, T cell lytic activity and lower angiogenesis score, T cell dysfunction and rejection score. TIDE analysis showed that MC1 patients were more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. MC1 patients were more sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors and traditional chemotherapy drugs Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, Embelin, and Sorafenib. Multiclass AUC based on RNASeq and GSE datasets were 0.85 and 0.85, respectively. Finally, based on co-expression network analysis, we screened 7 potential gene markers related to metabolic characteristic index, of which CLCA2, REEP6, SPDEF, and CRAT can be used to indicate breast cancer prognosis. Molecular classification related to TNBC metabolism was of great significance for comprehensive understanding of the molecular pathological characteristics of TNBC, contributing to the exploration of reliable markers for early diagnosis of TNBC and predicting metastasis and recurrence, improvement of the TNBC staging system, guiding individualized treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Metabolic Reprogramming in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Sun Xiangyu
    Wang Mozhi
    Wang Mengshen
    Yu Xueting
    Guo Jingyi
    Sun Tie
    Li Xinyan
    Yao Litong
    Dong Haoran
    Xu Yingying
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [42] Triple-negative breast cancer: An institutional analysis
    Gogia, A.
    Raina, V
    Deo, S. V. S.
    Shukla, N. K.
    Mohanti, B. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 51 (02) : 163 - 166
  • [43] Functional Proteomic Profiling of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Gromova, Irina
    Espinoza, Jaime A.
    Grauslund, Morten
    Santoni-Rugiu, Eric
    Talman, Maj-Lis Moller
    van Oostrum, Jan
    Moreira, Jose M. A.
    CELLS, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [44] Molecular Classification of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Ahn, Sung Gwe
    Kim, Seung Jun
    Kim, Cheungyeul
    Jeong, Joon
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2016, 19 (03) : 223 - 230
  • [45] Updates on the preoperative immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer
    Hu, Hong
    Kaklamani, Virginia
    TRANSLATIONAL BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 4
  • [46] Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Present and Future
    Isaac Kim
    Katherine Sanchez
    Heather L. McArthur
    David Page
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2019, 11 : 259 - 271
  • [47] Progress and Prospect of Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Luo, Chenyi
    Wang, Peipei
    He, Siqi
    Zhu, Jingjing
    Shi, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Jianxun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [48] Comprehensive Analysis of the Implication of PGRMC1 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Xu, Xin
    Ruan, Xiangyan
    Zhang, Ying
    Cai, Guiju
    Ju, Rui
    Yang, Yu
    Cheng, Jiaojiao
    Gu, Muqing
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 9
  • [49] Discovery of a new mitophagy-related gene signature for predicting the outlook and immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    Liu, Gang
    Yu, Guozheng
    Yin, Dongzhi
    Ma, Jianying
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [50] Metabolic Response of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer to Folate Restriction
    Coleman, Michael F.
    O'Flanagan, Ciara H.
    Pfeil, Alexander J.
    Chen, Xuewen
    Pearce, Jane B.
    Sumner, Susan
    Krupenko, Sergey A.
    Hursting, Stephen D.
    NUTRIENTS, 2021, 13 (05)