Landscape connectivity and predator-prey population dynamics

被引:41
作者
Baggio, Jacopo A. [1 ,2 ]
Salau, Kehinde [2 ,3 ]
Janssen, Marco A. [2 ]
Schoon, Michael L. [2 ]
Bodin, Orjan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Int Dev, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Human Evolut & Social Change, Ctr Study Inst Div, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Math Computat & Modeling Sci Ctr, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Networks; Landscape; Predator-prey; Coexistence; Survival probabilities; ABM; IBM; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODELS; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; COMPLEX NETWORKS; GRAPH-THEORY; DIFFUSION; BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTS; PERSISTENCE; PATCHINESS; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-010-9493-y
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Landscapes are increasingly fragmented, and conservation programs have started to look at network approaches for maintaining populations at a larger scale. We present an agent-based model of predator-prey dynamics where the agents (i.e. the individuals of either the predator or prey population) are able to move between different patches in a landscaped network. We then analyze population level and coexistence probability given node-centrality measures that characterize specific patches. We show that both predator and prey species benefit from living in globally well-connected patches (i.e. with high closeness centrality). However, the maximum number of prey species is reached, on average, at lower closeness centrality levels than for predator species. Hence, prey species benefit from constraints imposed on species movement in fragmented landscapes since they can reproduce with a lesser risk of predation, and their need for using anti-predatory strategies decreases.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 45
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Individualbased modeling and ecology, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400850624
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONTINENTAL CONSERVA
[3]  
BENSON DL, 1993, B MATH BIOL, V55, P365
[4]   Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems [J].
Blasius, B ;
Huppert, A ;
Stone, L .
NATURE, 1999, 399 (6734) :354-359
[5]   Complex networks: Structure and dynamics [J].
Boccaletti, S. ;
Latora, V. ;
Moreno, Y. ;
Chavez, M. ;
Hwang, D. -U. .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 2006, 424 (4-5) :175-308
[6]   A network approach for analyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape [J].
Bodin, Orjan ;
Norberg, Jon .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2007, 22 (01) :31-44
[7]   Combining endogenous and exogenous spatial variability in analytical population models [J].
Bolker, BM .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 2003, 64 (03) :255-270
[8]   Individual-based models as tools for ecological theory and application: Understanding the emergence of organisational properties in ecological systems [J].
Breckling, B ;
Middelhoff, U ;
Reuter, H .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 194 (1-3) :102-113
[9]  
Cleveland W. S., 1988, J AM STAT ASSOC, V83, P403
[10]   ROBUST LOCALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION AND SMOOTHING SCATTERPLOTS [J].
CLEVELAND, WS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 74 (368) :829-836