A Matched Cohort Analysis Comparing Stand-Alone Cages and Anterior Cervical Plates Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

被引:6
|
作者
Overley, Samuel C. [1 ]
Merrill, Robert K. [1 ]
Leven, Dante M. [1 ]
Meaike, Joshua J. [1 ]
Kumar, Abhishek [1 ]
Qureshi, Sheeraz A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
anterior cervical surgery; cervical fusion; stand-alone device; zero-profile device; dysphagia; cervical plating; ZERO-PROFILE IMPLANT; ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION; DEVICE; DYSPHAGIA; SPINE; SPONDYLOSIS; ADJACENT; OUTCOMES; SPACER; ACDF;
D O I
10.1177/2192568217699211
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To compare perioperative characteristics of stand-alone cages and anterior cervical plates used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: We reviewed 40 adult patients who received a stand-alone cage for elective ACDF and matched them with 40 patients who received an anterior cervical plate. We statistically compared operative time, length of stay, proportion of ambulatory cases, overall complications necessitating a trip to the ED, readmission, or reoperation related to index procedure. Results: There were 21 women and 19 men in the plate cohort with average ages of 53 years +/-12 and 20 women and 20 men in the stand-alone group with an average age of 52 years +/-11. With no statistical difference in total number, the plate group experienced 4 short-term (within 90 days of discharge) complications, including 3 patients who visited the emergency department for dysphagia and 1 who visited the emergency department for severe back pain, while the stand-alone group experienced 0 complications. There was no significant difference in operative time between the stand-alone group (75.35 min) and the plate group (81.35 min; P=.37). There was a significant difference between the proportion of ambulatory cases in the stand-alone group (25) and the plate group (6; P<.0001). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that stand-alone cages have fewer complications compared to anterior plating, with a lower trend of incidence of postoperative dysphagia. Stand-alone cages may offer the advantage of sending patients home ambulatory after ACDF surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 399
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The outcomes of stand alone polyetheretherketone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Ahmed, Abdulaziz F.
    Al Dosari, Mohammed Al Ateeq
    Al Kuwari, Abdulaziz
    Khan, Nasser Mehrab
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 45 (01) : 173 - 180
  • [2] The outcomes of stand alone polyetheretherketone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Abdulaziz F. Ahmed
    Mohammed Al Ateeq Al Dosari
    Abdulaziz Al Kuwari
    Nasser Mehrab Khan
    International Orthopaedics, 2021, 45 : 173 - 180
  • [3] The effects of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone cages at two contiguous levels on cervical alignment and outcomes
    Hong Joo Moon
    Joo Han Kim
    Jong-Hyun Kim
    Taek-Hyun Kwon
    Hung-Seob Chung
    Youn-Kwan Park
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2011, 153 : 559 - 565
  • [4] The effects of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone cages at two contiguous levels on cervical alignment and outcomes
    Moon, Hong Joo
    Kim, Joo Han
    Kim, Jong-Hyun
    Kwon, Taek-Hyun
    Chung, Hung-Seob
    Park, Youn-Kwan
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2011, 153 (03) : 559 - 565
  • [5] Dynamic Fusion Process in the Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Self-Locking Stand-Alone Cages
    Xiong, Yang
    Xu, Lin
    Bi, Lian-Yong
    Yang, Ji-Zhou
    Wang, Feng-Xian
    Qu, Yi
    Zhao, Zi-Yi
    Yang, Yong-Dong
    Zhao, Ding-Yan
    Li, Chuan-Hong
    Yu, Xing
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 125 : E678 - E687
  • [6] Cellular allograft for multilevel stand-alone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Gibson, Alec W.
    Feroze, Abdullah H.
    Greil, Madeline E.
    McGrath, Margaret E.
    Sivakanthan, Sananthan
    White-Dzuro, Gabrielle A.
    Williams, John R.
    Young, Christopher C.
    Hofstetter, Christoph P.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2021, 50 (06) : 1 - 6
  • [7] Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning
    Erol Gercek
    Vincent Arlet
    Josee Delisle
    Dante Marchesi
    European Spine Journal, 2003, 12 : 513 - 516
  • [8] Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning
    Gercek, E
    Arlet, V
    Delisle, J
    Marchesi, D
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2003, 12 (05) : 513 - 516
  • [9] Stand-alone Cervical Cages Versus Anterior Cervical Plates in 2-Level Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion Patients Analysis of Adjacent Segment Degeneration
    Ji, Gyu Yeul
    Oh, Chang Hyun
    Shin, Dong Ah
    Ha, Yoon
    Kim, Keung Nyun
    Yoon, Do Heum
    Yudoyono, Farid
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (07): : E433 - E438
  • [10] A Clinical Comparison of Anterior Cervical Plates Versus Stand-Alone Intervertebral Fusion Devices for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures
    Panchal, Ripul R.
    Kim, Kee D.
    Eastlack, Robert
    Lopez, John
    Clavenna, Andrew
    Brooks, Daina M.
    Joshua, Gita
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 99 : 630 - 637