Academics' Perceptions on Quality in Higher Education Shaping Key Performance Indicators

被引:28
作者
Varouchas, Emmanouil [1 ]
Sicilia, Miguel-Angel [2 ]
Sanchez-Alonso, Salvador [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Coll Greece Deree, Dept Comp Informat Syst, Sch Business & Econ, Ag Paraskevi Campus, GR-15342 Athens, Greece
[2] Univ Alcala, Dept Comp Sci, Madrid 28801, Spain
关键词
quality; sustainable curricula; higher education; quality metrics; key performance indicators; LEARNING ANALYTICS; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su10124752
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Institutions in higher education (HE) continuously strive to develop and deliver impactful educational programs. At the same time, they should continue to fulfill their mission to educate students in basic applied subjects and in parallel respond to the need to equip students with new skills. For this reason, higher education institutions (HEI) perform periodical curricular reviews adhering to internal and external quality assurance systems. The subsequent curricular reforms are of a transformative nature, preparing graduates to tackle the challenges of globalization, unemployment and vanishing professions. For these reforms to lead to sustainable curricula, the integration of quality into educational programs is instrumental. A suggested way of achieving a transformative stance is to provide the context for the application and diffusion of quality metrics in teaching and learning. This research intends to provide a discussion of key performance indicators (KPIs) related to quality. This paper presents the second round of qualitative interviews with higher education administrators and professors as a promising vehicle for advancing towards the formulation of KPIs based on their understanding of the different independent dimensions of the quality construct. These KPIs will provide valuable insights into improving teaching, learning and assessment and will eventually lead to sustainable curricula. Research findings outline the significance of the time invested to design and update a course, indicate that technology-enhanced learning solutions are perceived as key quality drivers, and point out the need to align courses with industry requirements and real-world problems. Additionally, findings indicate that the quality and impact of teaching and learning is promoted by the multi/inter-disciplinary character of a course, the engagement of students in interactive discussions and student research as part of summative assessment. The main contribution of this research is an analytic discussion of perceptions of higher education administrators and professors about quality, leading to a significant enrichment of the relevant literature. A set of innovative generic KPIs which can be used in multidimensional quality assessment in higher education is eventually proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Aas G.H., 2009, ASSESSING EDUCATIONA
  • [2] A model for total quality management in higher education
    Asif, Muhammad
    Awan, Muhammad Usman
    Khan, Muhammad Khalid
    Ahmad, Niaz
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2013, 47 (04) : 1883 - 1904
  • [3] Baker S., 2012, MANY QUALITATIVE INT, P1, DOI DOI 10.1177/1525822X05279903
  • [4] Burke J.C., 2001, LINKING STATE RESOUR, P7
  • [5] Chalmers D., 2008, P I MAN HIGH ED IMHE
  • [6] De Ketele J. M., 2008, Global University Network for Innovation (GUNi) Report on Higher Education in the World, P55
  • [7] Deming W.E., 1981, NATL PROD REV, V1, P12, DOI DOI 10.1002/NPR.4040010105
  • [8] Exploring perceived service quality, perceived value, and repurchase intention in higher education using structural equation modelling
    Dlacic, Jasmina
    Arslanagic, Maja
    Kadic-Maglajlic, Selma
    Markovic, Suzana
    Raspor, Sanja
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2014, 25 (1-2) : 141 - 157
  • [9] Higher education for today and tomorrow: university appraisal for diversity, innovation and change towards sustainable development
    Fadeeva, Zinaida
    Mochizuki, Yoko
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2010, 5 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [10] Advanced decision-making in higher education: learning analytics research and key performance indicators
    Lytras, Miltiadis D.
    Aljohani, Naif Radi
    Visvizi, Anna
    Ordonez De Pablos, Patricia
    Gasevic, Dragan
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 37 (10-11) : 937 - 940