Cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy

被引:14
|
作者
Khan, Iftekhar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Morris, Stephen [3 ]
Hackshaw, Allan [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Siow-Ming [4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, CRUK, London, England
[2] UCL, UCL Canc Trial Ctr, London, England
[3] UCL, Dept Appl Hlth Res, London, England
[4] Univ Coll London Hosp, UCL Canc Inst, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 07期
关键词
METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER; 2ND-LINE TREATMENT; PROSPECTIVE PHASE-2; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; DOCETAXEL; CETUXIMAB; RASH; GEFITINIB; SURVIVAL; NSCLC;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006733
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of erlotinib versus supportive care (placebo) overall and within a predefined rash subgroup in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who are unfit for chemotherapy and receive only active supportive care due to their poor performance status or presence of comorbidities. Setting: Between 2005 and 2009, a total of 670 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomised across 78 hospital sites (centres) in the UK. Participants: 670 patients with pathologically confirmed stage IIIb-IV NSCLC, unfit for chemotherapy, predominantly poor performance status (>2 on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ECOG) and estimated life expectancy of at least 8 weeks. Patients were followed until disease progression or death, including a subgroup of patients who developed first cycle rash. Interventions: Patients were randomised (1: 1) to receive best supportive care plus oral placebo or erlotinib (150 mg/day) until disease progression, toxicity or death. Primary outcome: Overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes: Progression-free survival (PFS), tumour response and quality adjusted life years (QALY), including within prespecified subgroups. Results: The mean incremental cost per QALY in all patients was 202 pound 571/QALY. The probability of cost-effectiveness of erlotinib in all patients was <10% at thresholds up to 100 pound 000. However, within the rash subgroup, the incremental cost/QALY was 56 pound 770/QALY with a probability of cost-effectiveness of about 80% for cost-effectiveness thresholds between 50 pound 000 to 60 pound 000. Conclusions: Erlotinib has about 80% chance of being cost-effective at thresholds between 50 pound 000-60 pound 000 in a subset of elderly poor performance patients with NSCLC unfit for chemotherapy who develop first cycle (28 days) rash. Erlotinib is potentially cost-effective for this population, for which few treatment options apart from best supportive care are available.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of first-line erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer unsuitable for chemotherapy (vol 5, e006733, 2015)
    Khan, I
    Morris, S.
    Hackshaw, A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (04):
  • [2] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gefitinib Alone and Combined with Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    Wang, Yao
    Huang, Kaiyu
    Sun, Sijia
    Deng, Yahong
    Xie, Xuefeng
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2022, 15 : 351 - 359
  • [3] Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Rh-Endostatin to First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in China
    Wu, Bin
    Chen, Huafeng
    Shen, Jinfang
    Ye, Ming
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 33 (10) : 1446 - 1455
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China
    Shang, Fangjian
    Zhang, Boyuan
    Kang, Shuo
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (03) : 337 - 343
  • [5] Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
    Hao, Xuezhi
    Shen, Aizong
    Wu, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Yang, Szu-Chun
    Ou, Huang-Tz
    Su, Wu-Chou
    Wang, Shi-Yi
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (07): : 8838 - 8850
  • [7] FIRST-LINE ERLOTINIB IN ELDERLY PATIENTS (PTS) WITH ADVANCED NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC)
    Merimsky, O.
    Cheng, A. C.
    Reck, M.
    Au, S. K.
    von Pawel, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 : 101 - 102
  • [8] The cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
    Lu, Tingting
    Huang, Yufan
    Cai, Zhongjie
    Lin, Wangchun
    Chen, Xiaoxiao
    Chen, Ruijia
    Hu, Yingying
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [9] Erlotinib in the first-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer
    D'Arcangelo, Manolo
    Cappuzzo, Federico
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2013, 13 (05) : 523 - 533
  • [10] Non-small-cell lung cancer patients unsuitable for first-line chemotherapy: A new category of patients for clinical studies?
    Parra, HJS
    Latteri, F
    Cavina, R
    De Vincenzo, F
    Zucali, PA
    Campagnoli, E
    Santoro, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (06) : 1078 - 1080