Memory conflicts and memory grey zones: War memory in Bosnia-Herzegovina between public memory disputes, literary narratives and personal experience

被引:1
作者
Andersen, Tea Sindbaek [1 ,3 ]
Borcak, Fedja Wierod [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, East European Hist & Culture, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Bosnia and Herzegovina; grey zone; individual memory; literature; memory conflict; memory politics; public memory; reception; war;
D O I
10.1177/17506980221134679
中图分类号
G [文化、科学、教育、体育]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 04 ;
摘要
In Bosnia and Herzegovina, memories of the 1990s war remain hugely divided on political and institutional levels, constituting what we may think of as a mnemonic war. Interview-based qualitative research shows that people in Bosnia on the individual level tend to follow the dominant narrative of their own group, yet, when challenged on these viewpoints, may also admit that other narratives and different truths may exist. Indeed, this research seems to propose the existence of a memorial grey zone where more open understanding and recognition of other positions is possible. Thus, while memory politics and memory institutionalization are rigidly opposed, other types of memory mediation may challenge the ethnic divisions of the memory landscape, opening up a memorial grey zone. In this article, we study the individual reception of literary works written by Bosnian emigre writers, asking how readers interact with established yet fluid memory discourses in Bosnia. Using focus groups as an interviewing method, we explore how the texts are perceived and discussed by lay readers in the two political entities, the Bosniak-Croat Federation and Republika Srpska. We are particularly interested in how readers make sense of the memory accounts in the texts, and how this relates to personal experiences and official memory narratives within each of the two entities. We argue that the reading and discussions of literary war memories allow for complex negotiations between personal and official 'group' narratives, opening a memorial grey zone that transcends the sharp divisions dominating memory politics in Bosnia and creates space for alternative memory positions.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1531
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Allen B., 1996, Rape warfare : the hidden genocide in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, Journal of Child Adolescent Trauma, DOI DOI 10.1007/S40653-014-0035-7
  • [3] Ethnopopulist denial and crime relativisation in Bosnian Republika Srpska
    Barton Hronesova, Jessie
    [J]. EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2022, 38 (01) : 21 - 42
  • [4] Becirevic E., 2017, GENOCIDE DRINA RIVER
  • [5] Beganovic D., 2005, RAZLIKA, V11, P33
  • [6] Bieber F, 2005, ETHN INEQUAL PUBLIC, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230501379
  • [7] Diversity in ethnicization: War memory landscape in Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Bozic, Gordana
    [J]. MEMORY STUDIES, 2019, 12 (04) : 412 - 432
  • [8] Brenner Manuela, 2011, Sudosteuropa. Zeitschrift fur Politik und Gesellschaft, P349
  • [9] Burg StevenL., 1999, The War in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Ethnic Conflict and International Intervention
  • [10] Cigar Norman., 1995, GENOCIDE BOSNIA POLI