Risky decision-making in individuals with substance use disorder: A meta-analysis and meta-regression review

被引:58
作者
Chen, Shujuan [1 ]
Yang, Pingyuan [1 ]
Chen, Tianzhen [1 ]
Su, Hang [1 ]
Jiang, Haifeng [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Min [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai Mental Hlth Ctr, 600 Wan Ping Nan Rd, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Key Lab Psychot Disorders, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Substance use; Addiction; Risky decision-making; Meta-analysis; Meta-regression; WHITE-MATTER INTEGRITY; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; NEUROIMAGING EVIDENCE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; IMPULSIVE PERSONALITY; DEPENDENT PATIENTS; INHIBITORY CONTROL; CANNABIS USE; ALCOHOL;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-020-05506-y
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background This review aims to identify whether risky decision-making is increased in substance users, and the impact of substance type, polysubstance use status, abstinence period, and treatment status on risky decision-making. Methods A literature search with no date restrictions was conducted to identify case-control studies or cross-sectional studies that used behavioral tasks to measure risky decision-making in substance users. A random-effects model was performed. GRADE criteria was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results 52 studies were enrolled. The result showed that the difference in risky decision-making performance between user groups and control groups was significant (SMD = - 0.590; 95%CI = - 0.849 to - 0.330; p < 0.001; I-2 = 93.4%; P-heterogeneity < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that users in the subgroups of alcohol (p < 0.001), tobacco (p < 0.01), cocaine (p < 0.001), opioid (p < 0.001), mixed group (p < 0.01), adult users (p < 0.001), small sample size (p < 0.001), large sample size (p < 0.01), low education (p < 0.001), high education (p < 0.001), short-abstinence period (p < 0.001), long-abstinence period (p < 0.001), without current polysubstance dependence (p < 0.001), and with treatment (p < 0.001) had increased risky decision-making when compared to the controls. On the other hand, elderly substance users with short-abstinence period showed increased risky decision-making. Moreover, current treatment status and polysubstance use may not influence the level of decision-making in substance users. Conclusions The results show that substance use is associated with impaired risky decision-making, indicating that interventions targeting risky decision-making in substance users should be developed for relapse prevention and rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:1893 / 1908
页数:16
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]   Machine-learning identifies substance-specific behavioral markers for opiate and stimulant dependence [J].
Ahn, Woo-Young ;
Vassileva, Jasmin .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2016, 161 :247-257
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI [DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596, 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, WORLD DRUG REP 2018
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Psychiatry, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.MPPSY.2008.05.011, 10.1016/j.mppsy.2008.05.011]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Global Accelerated Action for the Health of Adolescents (AA-HA!) Guidance to Support Country Implementation
[6]  
ARGYRIOU E, 2017, AGE IMPULSIVE BEHAV, V164, P106, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PBB.2017.07.013
[7]   Location, location: using functional magnetic resonance imaging to pinpoint brain differences relevant to stimulant use [J].
Aron, Jennifer L. ;
Paulus, Martin P. .
ADDICTION, 2007, 102 :33-43
[8]   Reward Sensitivity, Decisional Bias, and Metacognitive Deficits in Cocaine Drug Addiction [J].
Balconi, Michela ;
Finocchiaro, Roberta ;
Campanella, Salvatore .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE, 2014, 8 (06) :399-406
[9]   Impulsivity and opioid drugs: differential effects of heroin, methadone and prescribed analgesic medication [J].
Baldacchino, A. ;
Balfour, D. J. K. ;
Matthews, K. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (06) :1167-1179
[10]   Neuropsychological consequences of chronic opioid use: A quantitative review and meta-analysis [J].
Baldacchino, A. ;
Balfour, D. J. K. ;
Passetti, F. ;
Humphris, G. ;
Matthews, K. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2012, 36 (09) :2056-2068