Performance prediction strengths of noun and verb phrases in L2 writing: Comparison of density and complexity variables

被引:2
作者
Uzun, Kutay [1 ]
机构
[1] Trakya Univ, Egitim Fak, Ingilizce Ogretmenligi Bolumu, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Yerleskesi,Oda G-06, Merkez, Edirne, Turkey
关键词
Noun phrase complexity; Noun phrase density; Verb phrase density; Syntactic complexity; L2 writing performance; SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; QUALITY; PROFICIENCY; COHESION; ENGLISH; TEXT;
D O I
10.1016/j.asw.2021.100572
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study aimed to compare different noun and verb phrase density and complexity variables regarding if and how strongly they could predict L2 writing performance. 183 short literary analysis essays with analytically-obtained scores, written in an English as a Foreign Language context, were used as the corpus of the study. The scores were divided as low, mediocre and high scores by K-means cluster analysis. Separate regression models were built for each group using Complex Nominal per T-unit, Complex Nominal per Clause, Noun Phrase per Sentence, Noun Phrase per 1000 Words, Verb Phrase per T-unit, Verb Phrase per Sentence and Verb Phrase per 1000 Word as predictor variables. A multivariate model of noun phrase complexity was also tested. The results showed that Complex Nominal per T-unit was the strongest predictor of high performance. Verb Phrase per 1000 Words was the only significant verb phrase-based (negative) predictor of high performance. Mediocre performance could only be predicted by Complex Nominal per Clause. Low performance could not be predicted by any of the noun or verb phrasebased variables. The results confirm that noun phrase complexity develops across performance levels; however, more traditional (length based) complexity indices may be more useful to explain low performance.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Aarts J., 1988, ENGLISH SYNTACTIC ST
[2]   Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as indices of college -level L2 writers ' proficiency [J].
Barrot, Jessie S. ;
Agdeppa, Joan Y. .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2021, 47
[3]  
BIBER D, 2016, APPL LINGUIST, V37, P639, DOI DOI 10.1093/APPLIN/AMU059
[4]  
Biber D., 1999, Longman grammar of spoken and written english
[5]   Should We Use Characteristics of Conversation to Measure Grammatical Complexity in L2 Writing Development? [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany ;
Poonpon, Kornwipa .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2011, 45 (01) :5-35
[6]  
Bulte Bram., DIMENSIONS L2 PERFOR, P21
[7]  
Carnie A., 2006, Syntax: A Generative Introduction, V2nd
[8]   Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first-year L2 writing [J].
Casal, J. Elliott ;
Lee, Joseph J. .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2019, 44 :51-62
[9]   A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts [J].
Crossley, Scott A. ;
McCarthy, Philip M. ;
Louwerse, Max M. ;
McNamara, Danielle S. .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2007, 91 (01) :15-30
[10]   Predicting second language writing proficiency: the roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication [J].
Crossley, Scott A. ;
McNamara, Danielle S. .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2012, 35 (02) :115-135