Stability analysis of direct integration algorithms applied to nonlinear structural dynamics

被引:46
作者
Chen, Cheng [1 ]
Ricles, James M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lehigh Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, ATLSS Res Ctr, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
algorithms; dynamics; transfer functions; stability; structural dynamics; structural behavior;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:9(703)
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Direct integration algorithms are often used to solve the temporally discretized equations of motion for structural dynamic problems. Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the stability of integration algorithms for linear elastic structures. Studies involving the stability analysis of integration algorithms for nonlinear structures are limited. This paper utilizes discrete control theory to investigate the stability of direct integration algorithms for nonlinear structural dynamics. The direct integration algorithms are represented by a closed-loop block diagram, where the nonlinear restoring force of the structure is related to a varying feedback gain. The root locus method is used to analyze the stability of the closed-loop system for various degrees of nonlinear structural behavior. The well-known methods of the Newmark family of integration algorithms and the Hilber-Hughes-Taylor alpha method, as well as a newly developed integration algorithm, referred to as the CR integration algorithm, are analyzed using the proposed method. It is shown that the stability of an integration algorithm under nonlinear structural behavior is dependent on the poles and zeros of its open-loop discrete transfer function. An unconditionally stable integration algorithm for linear elastic structures is shown not to always remain stable under nonlinear structural behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 711
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Explicit pseudodynamic algorithm with unconditional stability [J].
Chang, SY .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2002, 128 (09) :935-947
[2]   Development of direct integration algorithms for structural dynamics using discrete control theory [J].
Chen, Cheng ;
Ricles, James M. .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2008, 134 (08) :676-683
[3]  
Chopra AnilK., 2000, Earthquake Spectra, V23, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.1586188
[4]  
Franklin G. F., 1986, Feedback control of dynamic systems
[5]   IMPROVED NUMERICAL DISSIPATION FOR TIME INTEGRATION ALGORITHMS IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS [J].
HILBER, HM ;
HUGHES, TJR ;
TAYLOR, RL .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1977, 5 (03) :283-292
[6]  
Hughes T. J. R., 1976, Computers and Structures, V6, P313, DOI 10.1016/0045-7949(76)90007-9
[7]  
Hughes T. J. R., 2012, The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis
[8]  
*MATHW INC, 2005, MATLAB VERS 7 0
[9]  
Mugan A, 2001, INT J NUMER METH ENG, V51, P333
[10]   Frequency-domain analysis of time-integration methods for semidiscrete finite element equations - part II: Hyperbolic and parabolic-hyperbolic problems [J].
Mugan, A ;
Hulbert, GM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2001, 51 (03) :351-376