The doctor and the patient-How is a clinical encounter perceived?

被引:27
作者
Adams, Robert [1 ]
Price, Kay [2 ]
Tucker, Graeme [3 ]
Anh-Minh Nguyen [3 ]
Wilson, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Hlth Observ, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ S Australia, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] S Australian Dept Hlth, Epidemiol Branch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Social space; Patient-centered care; Qualitative research; Population surveys; Doctor-patient relationship; HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS; CARE; MANAGEMENT; BEHAVIOR; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the population distribution of different types of relationships between people with chronic conditions and their doctors that influence decisions being made from a shared-decision making perspective. Methods: A survey questionnaire based on recurring themes about the doctor/patient relationship identified from qualitative in-depth interviews with people with chronic conditions and doctors was administered to a national population sample (n = 999) of people with chronic conditions. Results: Three factors explained the doctor/patient relationship. Factor 1 identified a positive partnership characteristic of involvement and shared decision-making; Factor 2 doctor-controlled relationship; Factor 3 relationship with negative dimensions. Cluster analysis identified four population groups. Cluster 1 doctor is in control (9.7% of the population); Cluster 2 ambivalent (27.6%); Cluster 3 positive long-term relationship (58.6%); Cluster 4 unhappy relationship (4.4%). The proportion of 18-34 year olds is significantly higher than expected in Cluster 4. The proportion of 65+ year olds is significantly higher than expected in Cluster 1, and significantly lower than expected in Cluster 4. Conclusion: This study adds to shared decision-making literature in that it shows in a representative sample of people with chronic illnesses how their perceptions of their experiences of the doctor-patient relationship are distributed across the population. Practice implications: Consideration needs to be given as to whether it is better to help doctors to alter their styles of interactions to suit the preferences of different patients or if it is feasible to match patients with doctors by style of decision-making and patient preference. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2003, EST RES POP AG SEX
[2]   Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: A study of videotaped General Practice consultations with hypertension patients [J].
Bensing J.M. ;
Tromp F. ;
Van Dulmen S. ;
Van Den Brink-Muinen A. ;
Verheul W. ;
Schellevis F.G. .
BMC Family Practice, 7 (1)
[3]  
Bourdieu P., 2001, SCI SCI REFLEXIVITY
[4]  
Bourdieu Pierre., 1989, SOCIOL THEOR, V7, P14, DOI [10.2307/202060, DOI 10.2307/202060]
[5]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[6]  
Clancy CM, 2006, J GEN INTERN MED, V21, pS63
[7]  
Clark W, 2006, J GEN INTERN MED, V21, pS45
[8]   Complexity and healing relationships [J].
Duffy, FD .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 21 (Suppl 1) :S45-S47
[9]  
Edwards A., 2009, Shared decision-making. Achieving evidence-based patient choice, P3, DOI DOI 10.1108/IJHCQA.2009.06222EAE.003
[10]  
EKMAN I, 1995, J ADV NURS, V22, P1006