Acceptance of a 5-mm distal bowel resection margin for rectal cancer: is it safe?

被引:33
作者
Rutkowski, A. [1 ]
Nowacki, M. P. [1 ]
Chwalinski, M. [1 ]
Oledzki, J. [1 ]
Bednarczyk, M. [1 ]
Liszka-Dalecki, P. [1 ]
Gornicki, A. [1 ]
Bujko, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Canc Ctr, Dept Colorectal Canc, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Canc Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Rectal cancer; anterior resection; distal bowel margin; COMBINED-MODALITY THERAPY; SPHINCTER-PRESERVING SURGERY; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; INTRAMURAL SPREAD; CM; PRESERVATION; CARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02542.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Acceptance of a short distal bowel margin results in a higher rate of anterior resection but may compromise oncological safety. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of a 5-mm distal margin. Method A retrospective analysis was carried out of 412 consecutive patients with rectal cancer treated with anterior resection with a negative circumferential resection margin. Radiotherapy was given to 63% of patients with an advanced tumour. The median follow up was 75 months. Results Fewer patients in the group with a distal margin of <= 5 mm had a tumour with an advanced pT stage compared to patients in the group with a distal margin of > 5 mm (P = 0.033). Two patients were converted to abdominoperineal resection because of a positive 'doughnut', leaving 410 patients, in whom 5.4% (95% CI, 0-11.3%) of the group with a distal margin of <= 5 mm had local recurrence at 5 years compared with 4.2% (95% CI, 2.1-6.3%) of the group with a distal margin of > 5 mm ( P = 0.726). The corresponding figures for the 5-year overall survival were 82.4% ( 95% CI, 72.6-92.2%) vs 76.3% ( 95% CI, 71.8-80.8%) ( P = 0.581). All four anastomotic recurrences occurred in the group with a distal margin of > 5 mm. Conclusion A distal margin of <= 5 mm did not compromise oncological safety in patients undergoing preoperative radiation for an advanced rectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 78
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Andreola S, 2001, ANN SURG ONCOL, V8, P611, DOI 10.1245/aso.2001.8.7.611
  • [2] Bozzetti F, 1999, CANCER, V86, P398, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<398::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-0
  • [4] Bujko K, 2001, ACTA ONCOL, V40, P593
  • [5] Distal intramural spread of rectal cancer after preoperative radiotherapy: The results of a multicenter randomized clinical study
    Chmielik, Ewa
    Bujko, Krzysztof
    Nasierowska-Guttmejer, Anna
    Nowacki, Marek P.
    Kepka, Lucyna
    Sopylo, Rafal
    Wojnar, Andrzej
    Majewski, Przemyslaw
    Sygut, Jacek
    Karmolinski, Andrzej
    Huzarski, Tomasz
    Wandzel, Piotr
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (01): : 182 - 188
  • [6] A prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy - Implications for sphincter preservation
    Guillem, Jose G.
    Chessin, David B.
    Shia, Jinru
    Suriawinata, Arief
    Riedel, Elyn
    Moore, Harvey G.
    Minsky, Bruce D.
    Wong, W. Douglas
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (01) : 88 - 93
  • [7] THE MESORECTUM IN RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY - THE CLUE TO PELVIC RECURRENCE
    HEALD, RJ
    HUSBAND, EM
    RYALL, RDH
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (10) : 613 - 616
  • [8] LEAKAGE FROM STAPLED LOW ANASTOMOSIS AFTER TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR CARCINOMA OF THE RECTUM
    KARANJIA, ND
    CORDER, AP
    BEARN, P
    HEALD, RJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (08) : 1224 - 1226
  • [9] Factors Associated With Anastomotic Recurrence After Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer Patients
    Kim, Young-Wan
    Kim, Nam-Kyu
    Min, Byung-Soh
    Huh, Hyuk
    Kim, Jin-Soo
    Kim, Jeong-Yeon
    Sohn, Seung-Kook
    Cho, Chang-Hwan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 99 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [10] Kinoshita H, 2004, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V51, P1362