Believing in a personal just world helps maintain well-being at work by coloring organizational justice perceptions

被引:20
作者
Johnston, Claire S. [1 ,5 ]
Krings, Franciska [2 ]
Maggiori, Christian [1 ,3 ]
Meier, Laurenz L. [4 ]
Fiori, Marina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Swiss Natl Ctr Competence Res LIVES Overcoming Vu, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Fac Business & Econ, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, Appl Res & Dev, Fribourg, Switzerland
[4] Univ Neuchatel, Inst Work & Org Psychol, Neuchatel, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
belief in a just world; organizational justice; work stress; job satisfaction; JOB-SATISFACTION; FIT INDEXES; NEO-FFI; BELIEFS; STRESS; TRUST; HEALTH; UNFAIRNESS; WORKPLACE; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1080/1359432X.2016.1192132
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Justice is a core fundamental theme for individuals in organizations. This study suggests that believing the world is just where one gets what one deserves, and deserves what one gets, is an important personal resource that helps maintain well-being at work. Further, it suggests that personal belief in a just world, but not general belief in a just world, exerts its influence on well-being through increasing overall justice perceptions of the work environment. Using two waves of data drawn from a large random sample of working adults in Switzerland, results showed that personal belief in a just world at time 1 indeed augmented perceptions of overall organizational justice, and this in turn increased job satisfaction at time 2, that is, 1year later. As expected, this effect was only evident for personal and not general belief in a just world, highlighting personal belief in a just world as an important yet largely overlooked resource for the work context, and suggesting the need to consider individual's beliefs about justice as drivers of overall organizational justice perceptions.
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 959
页数:15
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Effects of mobbing on justice beliefs and adjustment [J].
Adoric, Vera Cubela ;
Kvartuc, Tina .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 12 (04) :261-271
[2]   Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples [J].
Aluja, A ;
García, O ;
Rossier, J ;
García, LF .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2005, 38 (03) :591-604
[3]   The Role of Overall Justice Judgments in Organizational Justice Research: A Test of Mediation [J].
Ambrose, Maureen L. ;
Schminke, Marshall .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (02) :491-500
[4]  
Ambrose ML, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, P59
[5]   Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model [J].
Aryee, S ;
Budhwar, PS ;
Chen, ZX .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2002, 23 (03) :267-285
[6]   Bad apples in bad barrels revisited:: Cognitive moral development, just world beliefs, rewards, and ethical decision-making [J].
Ashkanasy, Neal M. ;
Windsor, Carolyn A. ;
Trevino, Linda K. .
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2006, 16 (04) :449-473
[7]   Two spheres of belief in justice:: Extensive support for the bidimensional model of belief in a just world [J].
Bègue, L ;
Bastounis, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2003, 71 (03) :435-463
[8]   Antecedents of trust in managers: a "bottom up" approach [J].
Bijlsma, KM ;
van de Bunt, GG .
PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2003, 32 (05) :638-664
[9]  
BLADER SL, 2005, RES SOCIAL ISSUES MA, V4, P3
[10]   Justice motive theory and the study of justice in work organizations: A conceptual integration [J].
Bobocel, D. Ramona ;
Hafer, Carolyn L. .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 12 (04) :283-289