Kinematic viscosity estimation of fuel oil with comparison of machine learning methods

被引:31
作者
Cengiz, Enes [1 ]
Babagiray, Mustafa [2 ,3 ]
Aysal, Faruk Emre [1 ]
Aksoy, Fatih [2 ]
机构
[1] Afyon Kocatepe Univ, Fac Technol, Mechatron Engn Dept, TR-03200 Afyon, Turkey
[2] Afyon Kocatepe Univ, Fac Technol, Automot Engn Dept, TR-03200 Afyon, Turkey
[3] Hamburg Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Fuel oil; Kinematic viscosity; Machine learning; Extreme learning machine; CETANE NUMBER; BIODIESEL; PREDICTION; DENSITY; COMBUSTION; BLENDS; REGRESSION; EMISSION; SOLVENT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123422
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
It is known that one of the important parameters affecting the emission and performance values of the liquid fuels used in thermal machines is the viscosity value. Therefore, many different studies have been carried out on the determination of dynamic and kinematic viscosities of liquid fuels. In this study, the kinematic viscosity value of Fuel Oil 4 at a constant temperature of 100 degrees C was estimated using machine learning methods. Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and K Nearest Neighbor (K-nn) methods were used to perform kinematic viscosity estimations. Two different distance metrics are considered in the K-nn algorithm. The experimentally obtained water content, density and flash point properties of the fuel were used as input data for machine learning approaches. Thus, four different models were developed for the kinematic viscosity estimation of Fuel oil fuel. The success rates of the predictions were compared using the Mean Relative Error (MRE) and Mean Squared Error (MSE). As a result, it was seen that all of the methods discussed provide predictive ability in accordance with standard values and the best prediction data is provided by using ELM.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   The Viscosity at Different Temperatures of Soybean and Sunflower Biodiesels and Diesel Fuel Blends [J].
Aksoy, F. ;
Baydir, S. A. ;
Bayrakceken, H. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2010, 32 (02) :148-156
[2]   Predicting the Density of Straight and Processed Vegetable Oils from Fatty Acid Composition [J].
Anand, K. ;
Ranjan, Avishek ;
Mehta, Pramod S. .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2010, 24 (05) :3262-3266
[3]   A technique to measure fuel oil viscosity in a fuel power plant [J].
Angel Delgadillo, Miguel ;
Ibargueengoytia, Pablo H. ;
Garcia, Uriel A. .
ISA TRANSACTIONS, 2016, 60 :303-311
[4]   A comparative analysis of the engine performance and exhaust emissions characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with Mono ethylene glycol supported emulsion [J].
Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad Safieddin ;
Calam, Alper ;
Yilmaz, Emre ;
Solmaz, Hamit .
FUEL, 2021, 288
[5]  
Babagiray M, P I MECH ENG D-J AUT, V2021
[6]   Neural network (ANN) approach to biodiesel analysis: Analysis of biodiesel density, kinematic viscosity, methanol and water contents using near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy [J].
Balabin, Roman M. ;
Lomakina, Ekaterina I. ;
Safieva, Ravilya Z. .
FUEL, 2011, 90 (05) :2007-2015
[7]  
Bayrakceken H, 2019, AFYON KOCATEPE U FEN, V19, P490
[8]  
Bayrakceken H, 2021, INT J AUTOMOTIVE SCI, V5, P1
[9]  
Cengiz E., 2021, DUZCE UNIVERSITESI B, V9, P215, DOI DOI 10.29130/DUBITED.842394
[10]  
Cengiz E., 2019, 4 INT S INN APPR ENG, P416, DOI [10.36287/setsci.4.6.107, DOI 10.36287/SETSCI.4.6.107]