Brain responses to lexical attestedness and phonological well-formedness as revealed by fast periodic visual stimulation

被引:4
作者
Vincent, Marion A. [1 ,3 ]
Vanstavel, Sebastien [1 ]
Patin, Cedric [2 ]
Mejias, Sandrine [1 ]
Basirat, Anahita [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193, SCALab Sci Cognit & Sci Affect, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Univ Lille, CNRS,STL Savoirs, UMR 8163, Textes, F-59000 Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille, Lab SCALab, CNRS, UMR 9193, Rue barreau, BP 60149, F-59653 Villeneuve dAscq, France
关键词
Steady-state evoked potentials; Fast-periodic visual stimulation; Sonority sequencing principle; Phonological constraints processing; Sublexical features; WORD RECOGNITION EVIDENCE; OCCIPITOTEMPORAL CORTEX; IMPLICIT MEASURE; FREQUENCY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105150
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
We investigated the mechanisms underlying the online-processing of phonological constraints using oddball fast periodic visual stimulation coupled with EEG. We focused on the Sonority Sequencing Principle and examined whether steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) are sensitive to the sonority constraint on syllable onsets. Native French speakers were presented with streams of CCVC non-words (C: consonant, V: vowel) at a fixed 6-Hz base rate. We manipulated the phonological well-formedness and lexical attestedness of CC onsets in two conditions. SSVPs were observed at the base rate associated to visual stimuli. As expected, they did not differ between conditions. Oddball SSVEPs were observed at 1.2 Hz (and its harmonics) and differed in the two conditions. These results showed that SSVEPs are sensitive to sublexical features. They also suggest that the processing of phonological constraints rely on mechanisms which could be dissociated from those underlying the processing of statistical properties of the lexicon.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Archangeli D, 2007, CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF PHONOLOGY, P353
[2]   Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation [J].
Barnes, Lydia ;
Petit, Selene ;
Badcock, Nicholas A. ;
Whyte, Christopher J. ;
Woolgar, Alexandra .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
[3]   Sonority projection effect in French: A signal detection theory approach [J].
Basirat, Anahita ;
Patin, Cedric ;
Jozefowiez, Jeremie .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE LINGUISTIQUE, 2021, 66 (02) :255-266
[4]   What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions [J].
Berent, Iris ;
Steriade, Donca ;
Lennertz, Tracy ;
Vaknin, Vered .
COGNITION, 2007, 104 (03) :591-630
[5]   On the Origins of Phonology [J].
Berent, Iris .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 26 (02) :132-139
[6]  
Clements G.N., 1990, Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech
[7]   DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud [J].
Coltheart, M ;
Rastle, K ;
Perry, C ;
Langdon, R ;
Ziegler, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (01) :204-256
[8]   Explaining sonority projection effects [J].
Daland, Robert ;
Hayes, Bruce ;
White, James ;
Garellek, Marc ;
Davis, Andrea ;
Norrmann, Ingrid .
PHONOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) :197-234
[9]   Phonological processing in speech perception: What do sonority differences tell us? [J].
Deschamps, Isabelle ;
Baum, Shari R. ;
Gracco, Vincent L. .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2015, 149 :77-83
[10]   Low-frequency cortical responses to natural speech reflect probabilistic phonotactics [J].
Di Liberto, Giovanni M. ;
Wong, Daniel ;
Melnik, Gerda Ana ;
de Cheveigne, Alain .
NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 196 :237-247