Postplacental intrauterine device expulsion by 12 weeks: a prospective cohort study

被引:42
|
作者
Goldthwaite, Lisa M. [1 ]
Sheeder, Jeanelle [1 ]
Hyer, Jennifer [2 ]
Tocce, Kristina [1 ]
Teal, Stephanie B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Family Planning, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Denver Hlth Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Denver, CO USA
关键词
intrauterine device; postpartum; CONTRACEPTIVE-DEVICES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; IUD INSERTION; EXPERIENCE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: An intrauterine device placed immediately following a delivery can serve as an effective and safe contraceptive strategy in the postpartum period. There is limited evidence that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system may have a higher rate of expulsion compared to the copper intrauterine device; however, rates of expulsion for these 2 intrauterine device types have not been compared directly. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare expulsion rates by 12 weeks' postpartum for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled women who received postplacental intrauterine devices at 2 urban hospitals. Eligible women were >= 18 years old, English-or Spanish-speaking, with singleton vaginal delivery at >= 35 weeks' gestation. Intrauterine devices were inserted within 10 minutes of placental delivery by trained providers using ring forceps or the operator's hand. Intrauterine device location was evaluated via abdominal ultrasound at 24-48 hours' postpartum, and via transvaginal ultrasound 6 and 12 weeks later, categorizing position of the intrauterine device at the fundus, below the fundus but above the internal os, any part of the intrauterine device below the internal os (partial expulsion), or no intrauterine device visualized. Outcomes included intrauterine device expulsion and method continuation. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with expulsion. RESULTS: We enrolled 123 women ages 18-40 years. Of these, 68 (55%) initiated levonorgestrel intrauterine system and 55 (45%) initiated copper intrauterine device. Groups were similar except more copper intrauterine device users were Hispanic (66% vs 38%) and fewer were primiparous (16% vs 31%). Among the 96 (78%) with 12-week follow-up, expulsion was higher for levonorgestrel intrauterine system users (21/55 or 38%) than for copper intrauterine device users (8/41 or 20%) (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-6.55; P=.05). At 24 hours' postpartum, there was no significant difference in median distance from the intrauterine device to the fundus between intrauterine device types or between those who did or did not experience expulsion. Of expulsions, 86% occurred <= 6 weeks' postpartum. All complete expulsions were clinically identified, but of the partial expulsions, only 4/10 (40%) were clinically suspected prior to ultrasound. The only independent predictor of expulsion was intrauterine device type. Including reinsertions, intrauterine device use at 12 weeks was not significantly different for levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device users (80% vs 93%; P=.14). CONCLUSION: Women initiating postplacental levonorgestrel intrauterine system are more likely to experience complete expulsion than those initiating copper intrauterine device. Using sonographic criteria results in higher expulsion rates than previously reported. It is unclear if such high expulsion rates would be identified following standard clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:674.e1 / 674.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Six-week retention after postplacental copper intrauterine device placement
    Colwill, Alyssa Covelli
    Schreiber, Courtney A.
    Sammel, Mary D.
    Sonalkar, Sarita
    CONTRACEPTION, 2018, 97 (03) : 215 - 218
  • [42] Frequency of Expulsion of Post-Placental Intrauterine Device
    Anwar, Shaista Bashir
    Shams, Nabila
    Kalavanti
    Yasmeen, Haleema
    Agha, Sahira
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (03): : 1492 - 1494
  • [43] Postplacental or delayed levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion and breast-feeding duration
    Chen, Beatrice A.
    Reeves, Matthew F.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Schwarz, E. Bimla
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (05) : 499 - 504
  • [44] Factors associated with missing strings and expulsion after postplacental insertion of copper T380A intrauterine devices
    da Silva Nobrega, Aureliana Barboza
    Pitangui, Ana Carolina Rodarti
    Vieira, Carolina Sales
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 157 (01) : 67 - 75
  • [45] A prospective cohort study of pain with intrauterine device insertion among women with and without vaginal deliveries
    Allen, R. H.
    Carey, M. S.
    Raker, C.
    Goyal, V.
    Matteson, K.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 34 (03) : 263 - 267
  • [46] Risk of Expulsion after Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion
    Lorenz, Judith
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (11) : 1070 - +
  • [47] Length of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine contraceptive device expulsion
    Valeria Bahamondes, M.
    Monteiro, Ilza
    Canteiro, Renata
    Fernandes, Arlete dos Santos
    Bahamondes, Luis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 113 (01) : 50 - 53
  • [48] Multivariate Algorithm for Predicting Risk of Intrauterine Device Expulsion
    Collier, Ai-ris Yonekura
    Gornbein, Jeffrey
    Kim, Caron Rahn
    Parvataneni, Ram Kiran
    Smith, Latisha
    Speichinger, Ella Dominique
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 : 61S - 62S
  • [49] Acceptability, efficacy and satisfaction rate for immediate postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device
    Wasim, T.
    Shaukat, S.
    Aslam, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 6 - 6
  • [50] Probability of Pregnancy after Intended Postplacental versus Interval Intrauterine Device Placement
    Hunter, Tegan
    Gurney, Elizabeth P.
    Schreiber, Courtney
    McAllister, Arden
    Sonalkar, Sarita
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 63S - 63S