Postplacental intrauterine device expulsion by 12 weeks: a prospective cohort study

被引:42
|
作者
Goldthwaite, Lisa M. [1 ]
Sheeder, Jeanelle [1 ]
Hyer, Jennifer [2 ]
Tocce, Kristina [1 ]
Teal, Stephanie B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Family Planning, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Denver Hlth Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Denver, CO USA
关键词
intrauterine device; postpartum; CONTRACEPTIVE-DEVICES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; IUD INSERTION; EXPERIENCE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: An intrauterine device placed immediately following a delivery can serve as an effective and safe contraceptive strategy in the postpartum period. There is limited evidence that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system may have a higher rate of expulsion compared to the copper intrauterine device; however, rates of expulsion for these 2 intrauterine device types have not been compared directly. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare expulsion rates by 12 weeks' postpartum for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled women who received postplacental intrauterine devices at 2 urban hospitals. Eligible women were >= 18 years old, English-or Spanish-speaking, with singleton vaginal delivery at >= 35 weeks' gestation. Intrauterine devices were inserted within 10 minutes of placental delivery by trained providers using ring forceps or the operator's hand. Intrauterine device location was evaluated via abdominal ultrasound at 24-48 hours' postpartum, and via transvaginal ultrasound 6 and 12 weeks later, categorizing position of the intrauterine device at the fundus, below the fundus but above the internal os, any part of the intrauterine device below the internal os (partial expulsion), or no intrauterine device visualized. Outcomes included intrauterine device expulsion and method continuation. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with expulsion. RESULTS: We enrolled 123 women ages 18-40 years. Of these, 68 (55%) initiated levonorgestrel intrauterine system and 55 (45%) initiated copper intrauterine device. Groups were similar except more copper intrauterine device users were Hispanic (66% vs 38%) and fewer were primiparous (16% vs 31%). Among the 96 (78%) with 12-week follow-up, expulsion was higher for levonorgestrel intrauterine system users (21/55 or 38%) than for copper intrauterine device users (8/41 or 20%) (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-6.55; P=.05). At 24 hours' postpartum, there was no significant difference in median distance from the intrauterine device to the fundus between intrauterine device types or between those who did or did not experience expulsion. Of expulsions, 86% occurred <= 6 weeks' postpartum. All complete expulsions were clinically identified, but of the partial expulsions, only 4/10 (40%) were clinically suspected prior to ultrasound. The only independent predictor of expulsion was intrauterine device type. Including reinsertions, intrauterine device use at 12 weeks was not significantly different for levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device users (80% vs 93%; P=.14). CONCLUSION: Women initiating postplacental levonorgestrel intrauterine system are more likely to experience complete expulsion than those initiating copper intrauterine device. Using sonographic criteria results in higher expulsion rates than previously reported. It is unclear if such high expulsion rates would be identified following standard clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:674.e1 / 674.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Association of Age and Parity With Intrauterine Device Expulsion
    Madden, Tessa
    McNicholas, Colleen
    Zhao, Qiuhong
    Secura, Gina M.
    Eisenberg, David L.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 124 (04): : 718 - 726
  • [32] Association of the Timing of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion and Breastfeeding With Risks of Intrauterine Device Expulsion
    Armstrong, Mary Anne
    Raine-Bennett, Tina
    Reed, Susan D.
    Gatz, Jennifer
    Getahun, Darios
    Schoendorf, Juliane
    Postlethwaite, Debbie
    Fassett, Michael J.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Saltus, Catherine W.
    Merchant, Maqdooda
    Alabaster, Amy
    Zhou, Xiaolei
    Ichikawa, Laura
    Shi, Jiaxiao M.
    Chiu, Vicki Y.
    Xie, Fagen
    Hunter, Shannon
    Wang, Jinyi
    Ritchey, Mary E.
    Chillemi, Giulia
    Im, Theresa M.
    Takhar, Harpreet S.
    Pisa, Federica
    Asiimwe, Alex
    Anthony, Mary S.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (02)
  • [33] Clinical Outcomes of Incidental, Postplacental Intrauterine Device Placement in the Setting of Chorioamnionitis
    Bayard, Katherine E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 : 8S - 8S
  • [34] Menstrual cup use and intrauterine device expulsion in a copper intrauterine device randomized trial
    Brown, Jill E.
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Wu, Hongsheng
    Hubacher, David
    Schreiber, Courtney A.
    Kaneshiro, Bliss
    Nanda, Kavita
    Blithe, Diana L.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 134
  • [35] Timings of insertion and complications among intrauterine copper device users; A prospective cohort study
    Irshad, Samina
    Bari, Arifa
    Qazi, Wardah Ajaz
    Pervaiz, Sanna
    Irshad, Shamim
    Irshad, Nasim
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 45 (03): : 731 - 734
  • [36] IMMEDIATE POSTPLACENTAL INSERTION OF THE INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE - A REVIEW OF CHINESE AND THE WORLDS EXPERIENCES
    XU, JX
    REUSCHE, C
    BURDAN, A
    ADVANCES IN CONTRACEPTION, 1994, 10 (01) : 71 - 82
  • [37] Infectious outcomes following immediate postplacental intrauterine device placement in the setting of chorioamnionitis: An exploratory, retrospective study
    Bayard, Katherine E.
    Fabricant, Sonya P.
    White, Jessica D.
    Gordon, Brian
    Nguyen, Brian T.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2023, 119
  • [38] Expanding long-acting contraceptive options: a prospective cohort study of the hormonal intrauterine device, copper intrauterine device, and implants in Nigeria and Zambia
    Brunie, Aurelie
    Stankevitz, Kayla
    Nwala, Anthony Adindu
    Nqumayo, Masauso
    Chen, Mario
    Danna, Kendal
    Afolabi, Kayode
    Rademacher, Kate H.
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 9 (10): : E1431 - E1441
  • [39] Menstrual Cup Use and Intrauterine Device Expulsion in a Copper Intrauterine Device Contraceptive Efficacy Trial
    Long, Jill
    Schreiber, Courtney
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    Kaneshiro, Bliss
    Nanda, Kavita
    Blithe, Diana
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 1S - 1S
  • [40] Does the shape of the copper intrauterine device affect device expulsion? Results from the ongoing European active surveillance study on LCS12
    Boehnke, Tanja
    Bauerfeind, Anja
    Eggebrecht, Lisa
    Cellier, Camille
    Lange, Jens
    Heinemann, Klaas
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 434 - 434