Postplacental intrauterine device expulsion by 12 weeks: a prospective cohort study

被引:42
|
作者
Goldthwaite, Lisa M. [1 ]
Sheeder, Jeanelle [1 ]
Hyer, Jennifer [2 ]
Tocce, Kristina [1 ]
Teal, Stephanie B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Family Planning, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Denver Hlth Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Denver, CO USA
关键词
intrauterine device; postpartum; CONTRACEPTIVE-DEVICES; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; IUD INSERTION; EXPERIENCE; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: An intrauterine device placed immediately following a delivery can serve as an effective and safe contraceptive strategy in the postpartum period. There is limited evidence that the levonorgestrel intrauterine system may have a higher rate of expulsion compared to the copper intrauterine device; however, rates of expulsion for these 2 intrauterine device types have not been compared directly. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare expulsion rates by 12 weeks' postpartum for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled women who received postplacental intrauterine devices at 2 urban hospitals. Eligible women were >= 18 years old, English-or Spanish-speaking, with singleton vaginal delivery at >= 35 weeks' gestation. Intrauterine devices were inserted within 10 minutes of placental delivery by trained providers using ring forceps or the operator's hand. Intrauterine device location was evaluated via abdominal ultrasound at 24-48 hours' postpartum, and via transvaginal ultrasound 6 and 12 weeks later, categorizing position of the intrauterine device at the fundus, below the fundus but above the internal os, any part of the intrauterine device below the internal os (partial expulsion), or no intrauterine device visualized. Outcomes included intrauterine device expulsion and method continuation. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with expulsion. RESULTS: We enrolled 123 women ages 18-40 years. Of these, 68 (55%) initiated levonorgestrel intrauterine system and 55 (45%) initiated copper intrauterine device. Groups were similar except more copper intrauterine device users were Hispanic (66% vs 38%) and fewer were primiparous (16% vs 31%). Among the 96 (78%) with 12-week follow-up, expulsion was higher for levonorgestrel intrauterine system users (21/55 or 38%) than for copper intrauterine device users (8/41 or 20%) (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-6.55; P=.05). At 24 hours' postpartum, there was no significant difference in median distance from the intrauterine device to the fundus between intrauterine device types or between those who did or did not experience expulsion. Of expulsions, 86% occurred <= 6 weeks' postpartum. All complete expulsions were clinically identified, but of the partial expulsions, only 4/10 (40%) were clinically suspected prior to ultrasound. The only independent predictor of expulsion was intrauterine device type. Including reinsertions, intrauterine device use at 12 weeks was not significantly different for levonorgestrel intrauterine system and copper intrauterine device users (80% vs 93%; P=.14). CONCLUSION: Women initiating postplacental levonorgestrel intrauterine system are more likely to experience complete expulsion than those initiating copper intrauterine device. Using sonographic criteria results in higher expulsion rates than previously reported. It is unclear if such high expulsion rates would be identified following standard clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:674.e1 / 674.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Risk factors for postpartum intrauterine device expulsion among women delivering at a tertiary Hospital in Uganda: a prospective cohort study
    Joy Muhumuza
    Richard Migisha
    Joseph Ngonzi
    Musa Kayondo
    Godfrey Mugyenyi
    Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, 6
  • [12] Risk factors for postpartum intrauterine device expulsion among women delivering at a tertiary Hospital in Uganda: a prospective cohort study
    Muhumuza, Joy
    Migisha, Richard
    Ngonzi, Joseph
    Kayondo, Musa
    Mugyenyi, Godfrey
    CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [13] Translocation of Postplacental Intrauterine Device: A Rare Complication
    Mishra S.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2016, 66 (Suppl 2) : 707 - 709
  • [14] Design of the Association of Uterine Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study: a multisite retrospective cohort study
    Anthony, Mary S.
    Reed, Susan D.
    Armstrong, Mary Anne
    Getahun, Darios
    Gatz, Jennifer L.
    Saltus, Catherine W.
    Zhou, Xiaolei
    Schoendorf, Juliane
    Postlethwaite, Debbie A.
    Raine-Bennett, Tina
    Fassett, Michael J.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    Ritchey, Mary E.
    Ichikawa, Laura E.
    Lynen, Richard
    Alabaster, Amy L.
    Merchant, Maqdooda
    Chiu, Vicki Y.
    Shi, Jiaxiao M.
    Xie, Fagen
    Hui, Siu L.
    Wang, Jinyi
    Hunter, Shannon
    Bartsch, Jennifer
    Frenz, Ann-Kathrin
    Chillemi, Giulia
    Im, Theresa M.
    Takhar, Harpreet S.
    Asiimwe, Alex
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (06) : 599.e1 - 599.e18
  • [15] The Future of Postplacental Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (PPIUCD) in Pakistan
    Asghar, Samina
    Homayun, Anum
    Awan, Faryal
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2016, 10 (01): : 320 - 322
  • [16] Association between intrauterine device type and risk of perforation and device expulsion: results from the Association of Perforation and Expulsion of Intrauterine Device study
    Gatz, Jennifer L.
    Armstrong, Mary Anne
    Postlethwaite, Debbie
    Raine-Bennett, Tina
    Chillemi, Giulia
    Alabaster, Amy
    Merchant, Maqdooda
    Reed, Susan D.
    Ichikawa, Laura
    Getahun, Darios
    Fassett, Michael J.
    Shi, Jiaxiao M.
    Xie, Fagen
    Chiu, Vicki Y.
    Im, Theresa M.
    Takhar, Harpreet S.
    Wang, Jinyi
    Saltus, Catherine W.
    Ritchey, Mary E.
    Asiimwe, Alex
    Pisa, Federica
    Schoendorf, Juliane
    Wahdan, Yesmean
    Zhou, Xiaolei
    Hunter, Shannon
    Anthony, Mary S.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (01) : 57.e1 - 57.e13
  • [17] Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of postplacental insertion of GyneFix postpartum intrauterine device among women undergoing cesarean section: A multicenter prospective cohort study in China
    Che, Yan
    Hou, Gui-Fang
    Zhang, Hong-Ping
    Yang, Heng
    Lin, Shu-Juan
    Gan, Tao
    Yang, Wei-Hua
    Shi, Chun-Hui
    Ren, Wei-Juan
    Xu, Ying-Qin
    Yin, Bao-Ming
    Chen, Ting -Ting
    Gan, Yu-Jie
    Zhang, Yuan
    Zhang, Yan
    Cheng, Li-Nan
    CONTRACEPTION, 2023, 122
  • [18] The association of insertion methods on immediate postpartum intrauterine device expulsion rates: A retrospective cohort study
    Perkins, Elena
    Federspiel, Jerome
    Bhattacharya, Deeya
    de los Reyes, Samantha
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 139
  • [19] THE ASSOCIATION OF INSERTION METHODS ON IMMEDIATE POSTPARTUM INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION RATES: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
    Perkins, E. M.
    Federspiel, J.
    Bhattacharya, D.
    de los Reyes, S.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2024, 139
  • [20] Immediate postplacental IUD insertion at cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study
    Levi, Erika
    Cantillo, Evelyn
    Ades, Veronica
    Banks, Erika
    Murthy, Amitasrigowri
    CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (02) : 102 - 105