Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research

被引:758
作者
Rubio, DM
Berg-Weger, M
Tebb, SS
Lee, ES
Rauch, S
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Ctr Res Hlth Care, Data Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] St Louis Univ, Sch Social Serv, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[3] St Francis Xavier Univ, Chicago, IL USA
[4] St Louis Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
关键词
constructs; content validity; measure; psychometric testing;
D O I
10.1093/swr/27.2.94
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Social scientists frequently study complex constructs. Despite the plethora of measures for these constructs, researchers may need to create their own measure for a particular study. When a measure is created, psychometric testing is required, and the first step is to study the content validity of the measure. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how to conduct a content validity study, including how to elicit the most from a panel of experts by collecting specific data. Instructions on how to calculate a content validity index, factorial validity index, and an interrater reliability index and guide for interpreting these indices are included. Implications regarding the value of conducting a content validity study for practitioners and researchers are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 104
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Content Validity Study of AIMIT (Assessing Interpersonal Motivation in Transcripts)
    Fassone, Giovanni
    Lo Reto, Floriana
    Foggetti, Paola
    Santomassimo, Chiara
    D'Onofrio, Maria Rita
    Ivaldi, Antonella
    Liotti, Giovanni
    Trincia, Valeria
    Picardi, Angelo
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2016, 23 (04) : 319 - 328
  • [22] Content validity of global measures for at-work productivity in patients with rheumatic diseases: an international qualitative study
    Leggett, Sarah
    van der Zee-Neuen, Antje
    Boonen, Annelies
    Beaton, Dorcas
    Bojinca, Mihai
    Bosworth, Ailsa
    Dadoun, Sabrina
    Fautrel, Bruno
    Hagel, Sofia
    Hofstetter, Catherine
    Lacaille, Diane
    Linton, Denise
    Mihai, Carina
    Petersson, Ingemar F.
    Rogers, Pam
    Scire, Carlo
    Verstappen, Suzanne M. M.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 55 (08) : 1364 - 1373
  • [23] Expanding the evidence of content validity for the Teacher Behavior Checklist using the IRAP: TBC's content validity using the IRAP
    Henklain, Marcelo H. O.
    Haydu, Veronica Bender
    Carmo, Joao S.
    Muniz, Monalisa
    Perez, William F.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2019, 69 (02) : 205 - 214
  • [24] Content Validity of a Measurement Instrument for the Social, Emotional and Intercultural Skills of Undergraduate Students
    Zuluaga, Sara Maria Yepes
    Granada, Willer Ferney Montes
    Salazar, John Antonio Alvarez
    [J]. ZONA PROXIMA, 2023, 38 : 110 - 133
  • [25] Content validity of the Harris Infant Neuromotor Test
    Harris, SR
    Daniels, LE
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1996, 76 (07): : 727 - 737
  • [26] Maintaining Content Validity in Computerized Adaptive Testing
    Luecht, Richard M.
    de Champlain, Andre
    Nungester, Ronald J.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 1998, 3 (01) : 29 - 41
  • [27] Content validity of the instruments through expert judgment
    Vicente Marin, Maria Gertrudis
    [J]. 6TH INTERDISCIPLINARY AND VIRTUAL CONFERENCE ON ARTS IN EDUCATION, CIVAE 2024, 2024, : 188 - 191
  • [28] Scale validity - A computer content analysis approach
    McTavish, DG
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 1997, 15 (04) : 379 - 393
  • [29] Content Validity Analysis of the Master Program in TEFL
    Jamalifar, Golnaz
    Tabrizi, Hossein Heidari
    Chalak, Azizeh
    [J]. GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON LINGUISTICS AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING (LINELT-2013), 2014, 136 : 293 - 297
  • [30] Face and content validity for the Wheelchair Satisfaction Questionnaire
    Bane, Heather McFadden
    Sheafer, Vicki
    Rispin, Karen
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 16 (05) : 545 - 549