Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data

被引:62
作者
Ellis, Cath [1 ]
van Haeringen, Karen [2 ]
Harper, Rowena [3 ]
Bretag, Tracey [4 ]
Zucker, Ian [1 ]
McBride, Scott [1 ]
Rozenberg, Pearl [5 ]
Newton, Phil [6 ]
Saddiqui, Sonia [4 ]
机构
[1] UNSW, Deans Unit, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Acad Serv, Adm, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Teaching Innovat Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ South Australia, Sch Management, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Sch Business, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Swansea Univ, Sch Med, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
关键词
Contract cheating; authenticity; assessment design; academic integrity; academic integrity breaches; PLAGIARISM; STUDENTS; PERCEPTIONS; DISHONESTY; UNIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; EDUCATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/07294360.2019.1680956
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contract cheating occurs when a student outsources their assessment to a third party, regardless of the third party?s relationship with the student, or whether money is exchanged. In higher education, there is a widespread belief that assessment design is a solution to the problem of contract cheating and that authentic assessment tasks are particularly effective. This research analysed two datasets ? 221 assignment orders placed on academic custom writing websites and 198 assessment tasks in which contract cheating was detected ? to investigate if authentic assessment can assure academic integrity. The authenticity of assessments was determined using five factors derived from the literature: frequency, fidelity, complexity, real-world impact and feed forward. Our analysis found that assessment tasks with no, some, or all of the five authenticity factors are routinely outsourced by students.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 469
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
ABUKARI Z, 2016, AWARENESS INCIDENCE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CONTR CHEAT HIGH ED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, AUSTR STAND CLASS ED
[5]   Students Reported for Cheating Explain What They Think Would Have Stopped Them [J].
Beasley, Eric M. .
ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2014, 24 (03) :229-252
[6]  
Biggs J. B., 1982, Evaluating the quality of learning-The SOLO taxonomy
[7]  
Blum SD, 2016, HANDBOOK OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY, P383, DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_57
[8]  
Bosco AM, 2014, ASIA-PAC J COOP EDUC, V15, P281
[9]  
Boud D., 2010, Assessment 2020. Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education
[10]  
BRETAG T, 2018, STUD HIGH EDUC