Patient Preferences for Pain Management in Advanced Cancer: Results from a Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:26
作者
Meads, David M. [1 ]
O'Dwyer, John L. [1 ]
Hulme, Claire T. [1 ]
Chintakayala, Phani [2 ,3 ]
Vinall-Collier, Karen [1 ,4 ]
Bennett, Michael I. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Acad Unit Hlth Econ, Charles Thackrah Bldg,101 Clarendon Rd, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Business Sch, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Data Analyt, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Sch Dent, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Acad Unit Palliat Care, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
CARE; PREVALENCE; LUNG;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-017-0236-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Pain from advanced cancer remains prevalent, severe and often under-treated. The aim of this study was to conduct a discrete choice experiment with patients to understand their preferences for pain management services and inform service development. Focus groups were used to develop the attributes and levels of the discrete choice experiment. The attributes were: waiting time, type of healthcare professional, out-of-pocket costs, side-effect control, quality of communication, quality of information and pain control. Patients completed the discrete choice experiment along with clinical and health-related quality of life questions. Conditional and mixed logit models were used to analyse the data. Patients with cancer pain (n = 221) and within palliative care services completed the survey (45% were female, mean age 64.6 years; age range 21-92 years). The most important aspects of pain management were: good pain control, zero out-of-pocket costs and good side-effect control. Poor or moderate pain control and A 30 pound costs drew the highest negative preferences. Respondents preferred control of side effects and provision of better information and communication, over access to certain healthcare professionals. Those with lower health-related quality of life were less willing to wait for treatment and willing to incur higher costs. The presence of a carer influenced preferences. Outcome attributes were more important than process attributes but the latter were still valued. Thus, supporting self-management, for example by providing better information on pain may be a worthwhile endeavour. However, service provision may need to account for individual characteristics given the heterogeneity in preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 651
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Why do patients with cancer access out-of-hours primary care? A retrospective study [J].
Adam, Rosalind ;
Wassell, Patrick ;
Murchie, Peter .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (619) :E99-E104
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, USING DISCRETE CHOIC
[3]  
[Anonymous], END LIF CAR STRAT PR
[4]   Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient [J].
Bate, Paul ;
Robert, Glenn .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 (05) :307-310
[5]   Effects coding in discrete choice experiments [J].
Bech, M ;
Gyrd-Hansen, D .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (10) :1079-1083
[6]   The Role of Patient Preferences in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis A Conflict of Values? [J].
Brazier, John E. ;
Dixon, Simon ;
Ratcliffe, Julie .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2009, 27 (09) :705-712
[7]   Cancer-related pain: a pan-European survey of prevalence, treatment, and patient attitudes [J].
Breivik, H. ;
Cherny, N. ;
Collett, B. ;
de Conno, F. ;
Filbet, M. ;
Foubert, A. J. ;
Cohen, R. ;
Dow, L. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (08) :1420-1433
[8]   Incorporating Process Utility into Quality Adjusted Life Years: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies [J].
Brennan, Victoria K. ;
Dixon, Simon .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (08) :677-691
[9]   EuroQol: The current state of play [J].
Brooks, R .
HEALTH POLICY, 1996, 37 (01) :53-72
[10]   Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care [J].
Campbell, Neil C. ;
Murray, Elizabeth ;
Darbyshire, Janet ;
Emery, Jon ;
Farmer, Andrew ;
Griffiths, Frances ;
Guthrie, Bruce ;
Lester, Helen ;
Wilson, Phil ;
Kinmonth, Ann Louise .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7591) :455-459