Relationship between negative teacher behaviors and student engagement: Evidence from India

被引:5
作者
Kuril, Samvet [1 ]
Gupta, Vishal [2 ]
Chand, Vijaya Sherry [3 ]
机构
[1] Ahmedabad Univ, Management & Org, Ahmadabad 380009, Gujarat, India
[2] Indian Inst Management Ahmedabad, Org Behav, Ahmadabad 380015, Gujarat, India
[3] Indian Inst Management Ahmedabad, Ravi J Matthai Ctr Educ Innovat, Ahmadabad 380015, Gujarat, India
关键词
Student engagement; Negative teacher behavior; Teacher education; Cognitive and metacognitive strategies; India; SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT; GOAL ORIENTATION; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; CORPORAL PUNISHMENT; CHILD RELATIONSHIPS; SELF-EFFICACY; CLASSROOM; ACHIEVEMENT; FEEDBACK; CONSTRUCT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101858
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
While positive teacher behavior is known to promote student engagement, the impact of negative teacher behavior, especially in public schools in developing countries, has not been explored in the literature so far. Through structural equation modeling of 3108 student responses (52% girls), belonging to different social groups, collected at two time points one year apart, we found that student engagement is negatively correlated with negative teacher behavior. The results also indicated that the relationship is mediated by student cognitive and metacognitive self-regulating strategies. Mastery goal orientation moderated the relationship. The research shows that the curriculum of teacher training programs must include sensitization about the impact of negative teacher behavior on student learning in general, and student engagement in particular.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
[2]   CLASSROOMS - GOALS, STRUCTURES, AND STUDENT MOTIVATION [J].
AMES, C .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (03) :261-271
[3]  
Anand M., 2014, Practice, V26, P225, DOI [10.1080/09503153.2014.934798, DOI 10.1080/09503153.2014.934798]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, LEARN REAL ED PROM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PRIM ED IND
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Ethical guidelines for educational research, V4th
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1999, How people learn
[8]  
Arnold JA, 2000, J ORGAN BEHAV, V21, P249, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-#
[10]  
ASER, 2018, Annual Status of Education Report