Primary reconstruction of orbital fractures using patient-specific titanium milled implants: the Helsinki protocol

被引:36
作者
Karkkainen, M. [1 ,2 ]
Wilkman, T. [2 ]
Mesimaki, K. [2 ]
Snall, J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Dis, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Dis, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
patient specific implant; virtual planning; orbital fracture; facial fracture; WALL FRACTURES; POSTTRAUMATIC ENOPHTHALMOS; MESH; FLOOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.08.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Preoperative virtual planning and the use of patient-specific implants enable exact reconstruction of orbital fractures. We present our results and experience of reconstruction of isolated orbital fractures with patient-specific implants, according to the Helsinki protocol, in 15 patients who were followed up for at least three months postoperatively. The mean (range) difference between the positions of virtually planned, and postoperative, implants was 1.9 (0.5-5.6) mm The postoperative volume of the fractured orbit was 1.34 ml less than that of the non-fractured side, but this was not clinically relevant. None of the patients required reoperation and none had any implant-related complications during follow up. We conclude that patient-specific implants are an adaptable and reliable treatment for primary orbital trauma, and that the Helsinki protocol may have wider applications in the treatment of facial fractures. (C) 2018 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 796
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Low-Cost 3D Printing Orbital Implant Templates in Secondary Orbital Reconstructions
    Callahan, Alison B.
    Campbell, Ashley A.
    Petris, Carisa
    Kazim, Michael
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 33 (05) : 376 - 380
  • [2] Predicting late enophthalmos: Differences between medial and inferior orbital wall fractures
    Choi, Jaehoon
    Park, Sang Woo
    Kim, Junhyung
    Park, Jeongseob
    Kim, Jun Sik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2016, 69 (12) : E238 - E244
  • [3] Posttraumatic enophthalmos: Etiology, principles of reconstruction, and correction
    Clauser, Luigi
    Galie, Manlio
    Pagliaro, Francesco
    Tieghi, Riccardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 19 (02) : 351 - 359
  • [4] Culler Steven D, 2017, Arthroplast Today, V3, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.artd.2017.05.001
  • [5] Severe distortion of an orbital titanium mesh implant after recurrent facial trauma: a potential threat to the orbital contents?
    Foletti, J. M.
    Scolozzi, P.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 55 (08) : 836 - 838
  • [6] Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures
    Gander, Thomas
    Essig, Harald
    Metzler, Philipp
    Lindhorst, Daniel
    Dubois, Leander
    Ruecker, Martin
    Schumann, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (01) : 126 - 130
  • [7] Should Virtual Mirroring Be Used in the Preoperative Planning of an Orbital Reconstruction?
    Jansen, Jesper
    Dubois, Leander
    Schreurs, Ruud
    Gooris, Peter J. J.
    Maal, Thomas J. J.
    Beenen, Ludo F.
    Becking, Alfred G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (02) : 380 - 387
  • [8] Jin HR, 2000, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V58, P617
  • [9] Postoperative Changes in Isolated Medial Orbital Wall Fractures Based on Computed Tomography
    Jung, Soyeon
    Lee, Jang Won
    Kim, Chung Hun
    Hwang, Euna
    Lim, Hyoseob
    Jung, Sung Won
    Koh, Sung Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (08) : 2038 - 2041
  • [10] The accuracy of patient specific implant prebented with 3D-printed rapid prototype model for orbital wall reconstruction
    Kim, Young Chul
    Jeong, Woo Shik
    Park, Tae-Kyung
    Choi, Jong Woo
    Koh, Kyung S.
    Oh, Tae Suk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (06) : 928 - 936