The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: Testing four models of the complex span paradigm

被引:82
作者
Hudjetz, Annekatrin [1 ]
Oberauer, Klaus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03193501
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Four models of working memory processes in the complex span paradigm were tested: The task-switching model of Towse, Hitch, and Hutton (1998), the interference account of Saito and Miyake (2004), and two versions of the time-based resource-sharing model of Barrouillet, Bernardin, and Camos (2004). On the basis of a reading span paradigm that used segmented sentences, the effect of processing time on the recall of words was investigated while the amount of processing was held constant. Two conditions of reading (continuous vs. normal) were compared in order to study the influence of brief pauses during reading that could be used for articulatory rehearsal. The results favor a version of the time-based resource-sharing model: A faster reading rate had a negative effect on recall. The effect of reading rate was obtained with continuous as well as normal reading, revealing that even continuous articulation does not prevent simultaneous refreshing of memory traces. A second experiment showed that continuous reading made concurrent articulatory rehearsal virtually impossible. These findings imply that a second rehearsal mechanism for verbal working memory, other than articulatory rehearsal, exists.
引用
收藏
页码:1675 / 1684
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WORKING MEMORY
[2]   WORD LENGTH AND STRUCTURE OF SHORT-TERM-MEMORY [J].
BADDELEY, AD ;
THOMSON, N ;
BUCHANAN, M .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1975, 14 (06) :575-589
[3]  
BADDELEY D, 1974, PSYCHOL LEARN MOTIV, V8, P47
[4]  
Barrett J F, 2000, Curr Opin Investig Drugs, V1, P45
[5]   Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans [J].
Barrouillet, P ;
Bernardin, S ;
Camos, V .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (01) :83-100
[6]   MODELING ITEM LENGTH EFFECTS IN MEMORY SPAN - NO REHEARSAL NEEDED [J].
BROWN, GDA ;
HULME, C .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (05) :594-621
[7]   Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide [J].
Conway, ARA ;
Kane, MJ ;
Bunting, MF ;
Hambrick, DZ ;
Wilhelm, O ;
Engle, RW .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2005, 12 (05) :769-786
[8]  
Cowan N., 1995, ATTENTION MEMORY INT, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195119107.001.0001
[9]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY AND READING [J].
DANEMAN, M ;
CARPENTER, PA .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1980, 19 (04) :450-466
[10]   What limits children's working memory span? Theoretical accounts and applications for scholastic development [J].
Hitch, GJ ;
Towse, JN ;
Hutton, U .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2001, 130 (02) :184-198