Intraindividual Comparison of Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MR Imaging and 64-Section Multidetector CT in the Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Cirrhosis

被引:219
作者
Di Martino, Michele [1 ]
Marin, Daniele [1 ]
Guerrisi, Antonino [1 ]
Baski, Mahbubeh [1 ,2 ]
Galati, Francesca [1 ]
Rossi, Massimo
Brozzetti, Stefania [3 ]
Masciangelo, Raffaele [4 ]
Passariello, Roberto [1 ]
Catalano, Carlo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Radiol Sci, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Gen Surg, Div Organ Transplantat, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Surg P Valdoni, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Stat, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
FOCAL LIVER-LESIONS; GD-EOB-DTPA; HELICAL CT; HISTOPATHOLOGIC FINDINGS; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; DYSPLASTIC NODULES; SPIRAL CT; TRANSPLANTATION; RESECTION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.10091334
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively compare gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with multiphasic 64-section multidetector computed tomography (CT) in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained for this prospective study. Fifty-eight patients (39 men, 19 women; mean age, 63 years; age range, 35-84 years) underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging and multiphasic 64-section multidetector CT. The imaging examinations were performed within 30 days of each other. The two sets of images were qualitatively analyzed in random order by three independent readers in a blinded and retrospective fashion. Using strict diagnostic criteria for HCC, readers classified all detected lesions with use of a four-point confidence scale. The reference standard was a combination of pathologic proof, conclusive imaging findings, and substantial tumor growth at follow-up CT or MR imaging (range of follow-up, 90-370 days). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and positive predictive value were compared between the two image sets. Interreader variability was assessed. The accuracy of each imaging method was determined by using an adjusted modified chi(2) test. Results: Eighty-seven HCCs (mean size 6 standard deviation, 1.8 cm +/- 1.5; range, 0.3-7.0 cm) were confirmed in 42 of the 58 patients. Regardless of lesion size, the average diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for all readers were significantly greater with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging (average diagnostic accuracy: 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.80, 0.97; average sensitivity: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.96) than with multidetector CT (average diagnostic accuracy: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.82; average sensitivity: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.59, 0.79) (P < .001 for each). No significant difference in positive predictive value was observed between the two image sets for each reader. Interreader agreement was good to excellent. Conclusion: Compared with multiphasic 64-section multidetector CT, gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging yields significantly higher diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity in the detection of HCC in patients with cirrhosis. (C) RSNA, 2010
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 816
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, HEPATOLOGY, V22, P983
[2]   Small hepatocellular carcinoma in child a cirrhotic patients:: Hepatic resection versus transplantation [J].
Bigourdan, JM ;
Jaeck, D ;
Meyer, N ;
Meyer, C ;
Oussoultzoglou, E ;
Bachellier, P ;
Weber, JC ;
Audet, M ;
Doffoël, M ;
Wolf, P .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (05) :513-520
[3]   SURGICAL ANATOMY AND ANATOMICAL SURGERY OF THE LIVER [J].
BISMUTH, H .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 6 (01) :3-9
[4]   Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent: US Multicenter Phase III study [J].
Bluemke, DA ;
Sahani, D ;
Amendola, M ;
Balzer, T ;
Breuer, J ;
Brown, JJ ;
Casalino, DD ;
Davis, PL ;
Francis, IR ;
Krinsky, G ;
Lee, FT ;
Lu, D ;
Paulson, EK ;
Schwartz, LH ;
Siegelman, ES .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (01) :89-98
[5]   Characterization of small nodules in cirrhosis by assessment of vascularity: The problem of hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Bolondi, L ;
Gaiani, S ;
Celli, N ;
Goffieri, R ;
Grigioni, WF ;
Leoni, S ;
Venturi, AM ;
Piscaglia, F .
HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (01) :27-34
[6]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (01) :24-28
[7]   Helical CT screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: Frequency and causes of false-positive interpretation. [J].
Brancatelli, G ;
Baron, RL ;
Peterson, MS ;
Marsh, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (04) :1007-1014
[8]   Current concepts - Computed tomography - An increasing source of radiation exposure [J].
Brenner, David J. ;
Hall, Eric J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (22) :2277-2284
[9]   Management of hepatoceullular carcinoma [J].
Bruix, J ;
Sherman, M .
HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (05) :1208-1236
[10]   3.0-T MR Imaging of the Abdomen: Comparison with 1.5 T [J].
Chang, Kevin J. ;
Kamel, Ihab R. ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Bluemke, David A. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (07) :1983-1998