Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing

被引:272
作者
Kong, YY
Stickney, GS
Zeng, FG
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Cognit Sci, Hearing & Speech Res Lab, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Hearing & Speech Res Lab, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Anat & Neurobiol, Hearing & Speech Res Lab, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Biochem Engn, Hearing & Speech Res Lab, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.1857526
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Speech recognition in noise and music perception is especially challenging for current cochlear implant users. The present study utilizes the residual acoustic hearing in the nonimplanted ear in five cochlear implant users to elucidate the role of temporal fine structure at low frequencies in auditory perception and to test the hypothesis that combined acoustic and electric hearing produces better performance than either mode alone. The first experiment measured speech recognition in the presence of competing noise. It was found that, although the residual low-frequency (< 1000 Hz) acoustic hearing produced essentially no recognition for speech recognition in noise, it significantly enhanced performance when combined with the electric hearing. The second experiment measured melody recognition in the same group of subjects and found that, contrary to the speech recognition result, the low-frequency acoustic hearing produced significantly better performance than the electric hearing. It is hypothesized that listeners with combined acoustic and electric hearing might use the correlation between the salient pitch in low-frequency acoustic hearing and the weak pitch in the envelope to enhance segregation between signal and noise. The present study suggests the importance and urgency of accurately encoding the fine-structure cue in cochlear implants. (c) 2005 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:1351 / 1361
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Armstrong M, 1997, AM J OTOL, V18, pS140
[2]   MODELING THE PERCEPTION OF CONCURRENT VOWELS - VOWELS WITH DIFFERENT FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCIES [J].
ASSMANN, PF ;
SUMMERFIELD, Q .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1990, 88 (02) :680-697
[3]   Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations [J].
Blamey, PJ ;
Dooley, GJ ;
Parisi, ES ;
Clark, GM .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1996, 99 (1-2) :139-150
[4]   Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing [J].
Blamey, PJ ;
Dooley, GJ ;
James, CJ ;
Parisi, ES .
EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (01) :6-17
[5]   INTONATION AND THE PERCEPTUAL SEPARATION OF SIMULTANEOUS VOICES [J].
BROKX, JPL ;
NOOTEBOOM, SG .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 1982, 10 (01) :23-36
[6]   PLAYED-AGAIN SAM - FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE PITCH OF AMPLITUDE-MODULATED NOISE [J].
BURNS, EM ;
VIEMEISTER, NF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1981, 70 (06) :1655-1660
[7]  
CARHART R, 1965, INT AUDIOL, V4, P5
[8]   Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears [J].
Ching, TYC ;
Incerti, P ;
Hill, M .
EAR AND HEARING, 2004, 25 (01) :9-21
[9]   Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear? [J].
Ching, TYC ;
Psarros, C ;
Hill, M ;
Dillon, H ;
Incerti, P .
EAR AND HEARING, 2001, 22 (05) :365-380
[10]  
Chmiel R, 1995, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, V166, P314