Growing polarization around climate change on social media

被引:158
作者
Falkenberg, Max [1 ]
Galeazzi, Alessandro [2 ]
Torricelli, Maddalena [1 ]
Di Marco, Niccolo [3 ]
Larosa, Francesca [4 ,5 ]
Sas, Madalina [6 ]
Mekacher, Amin [1 ]
Pearce, Warren [7 ]
Zollo, Fabiana [2 ,8 ]
Quattrociocchi, Walter [9 ]
Baronchelli, Andrea [1 ,10 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Dept Math, London, England
[2] CaFoscari Univ Venice, Dept Environm Sci Informat & Stat, Venice, Italy
[3] Univ Florence, Florence, Italy
[4] UCL, Inst Sustainable Resources, London, England
[5] Euro Mediterranean Ctr Climate Change CMCC, Venice, Italy
[6] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Complex Sci, London, England
[7] Univ Sheffield, Dept Sociol Studies, iHuman, Sheffield, England
[8] New Inst Ctr Environm Humanities, Venice, Italy
[9] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Comp Sci, Rome, Italy
[10] Alan Turing Inst, British Lib, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41558-022-01527-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change and political polarization are two of the twenty-first century's critical socio-political issues. Here we investigate their intersection by studying the discussion around the United Nations Conference of the Parties on Climate Change (COP) using Twitter data from 2014 to 2021. First, we reveal a large increase in ideological polarization during COP26, following low polarization between COP20 and COP25. Second, we show that this increase is driven by growing right-wing activity, a fourfold increase since COP21 relative to pro-climate groups. Finally, we identify a broad range of 'climate contrarian' views during COP26, emphasizing the theme of political hypocrisy as a topic of cross-ideological appeal; contrarian views and accusations of hypocrisy have become key themes in the Twitter climate discussion since 2019. With future climate action reliant on negotiations at COP27 and beyond, our results highlight the importance of monitoring polarization and its impacts in the public climate discourse.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / +
页数:18
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization [J].
Bail, Christopher A. ;
Argyle, Lisa P. ;
Brown, Taylor W. ;
Bumpus, John P. ;
Chen, Haohan ;
Hunzaker, M. B. Fallin ;
Lee, Jaemin ;
Mann, Marcus ;
Merhout, Friedolin ;
Volfovsky, Alexander .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (37) :9216-9221
[2]   Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber? [J].
Barbera, Pablo ;
Jost, John T. ;
Nagler, Jonathan ;
Tucker, Joshua A. ;
Bonneau, Richard .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (10) :1531-1542
[3]   Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data [J].
Barbera, Pablo .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 23 (01) :76-91
[4]  
Benzecri JP, 1973, ANAL DONNEES, V2
[5]   Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation [J].
Bessi, Alessandro ;
Coletto, Mauro ;
Davidescu, George Alexandru ;
Scala, Antonio ;
Caldarelli, Guido ;
Quattrociocchi, Walter .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02)
[6]   Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [J].
Bhadani, Saumya ;
Yamaya, Shun ;
Flammini, Alessandro ;
Menczer, Filippo ;
Ciampaglia, Giovanni Luca ;
Nyhan, Brendan .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 6 (04) :495-505
[7]   Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election [J].
Bovet, Alexandre ;
Makse, Hernan A. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
[8]  
Boykoff M., 2021, MEDIA CLIMATE CHANGE, DOI [10.25810/2nc9-bj43, DOI 10.25810/2NC9-BJ43]
[9]   Understanding Polarization: Meanings, Measures, and Model Evaluation [J].
Bramson, Aaron ;
Grim, Patrick ;
Singer, Daniel J. ;
Berger, William J. ;
Sack, Graham ;
Fisher, Steven ;
Flocken, Carissa ;
Holman, Bennett .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2017, 84 (01) :115-159
[10]  
Burgess J, 2020, TWITTER