Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT: Effect of body weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, and obesity

被引:183
作者
Bae, Kyongtae T. [1 ]
Seeck, Brian A. [2 ]
Hildebolt, Charles F. [3 ]
Tao, Cheng [1 ]
Zhu, Fang [1 ]
Kanematsu, Masayuki [4 ]
Woodard, Pamela K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Cardiol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[4] Gifu Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Gifu, Japan
关键词
aorta; cardiac CT; CT angiography; vascular imaging;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.07.2765
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of body weight, height, body surface area (BSA), body mass index (BMI), and obesity on aortic contrast enhancement in cardiac MDCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy-three consecutive patients underwent cardiac CT angiography on a 64-MDCT scanner. Seventy-five mL of contrast medium (350 mg I/mL) was injected at 4.5 mL/s, followed by a 40-mL saline flush at 4.5 mL/s. The scanning delay of CT was determined with a bolus tracking technique. Aortic attenuation was measured over the aortic-root lumen. BMI and BSA were calculated from the patient's body weight and height. The patients were divided into low- (BMI < 30) and high- (>= 30) BMI groups. Associations of aortic attenuation with body weight, height, BMI, and BSA, were evaluated with regression analysis and the Student's t test. RESULTS. Strong inverse correlations were seen between aortic attenuation and body weight (r = -0.73), height (r = -0.47), BMI (r = -0.63), and BSA (r = -0.74) (P < 0.001 for all). The regression formula of aortic attenuation versus body weight suggests that 1.0 mL/kg of contrast medium would yield a mean aortic attenuation of 355 H. The mean aortic attenuation was significantly higher in the low-BMI (352.6 +/- 59.1 H) than in the high-BMI (286.2 +/- 55.5 H) group. The regression formula for aortic attenuation on body weight was aortic attenuation = 586 - 3.1 body weight (p < 0.001) for the low-BMI group and aortic attenuation = 485 - 1.9 body weight (p < 0.001) for the high-BMI group, suggesting that the amount of contrast medium required with increased body weight is less in the high-BMI group. This group difference was less pronounced for the regression of aortic attenuation on BSA. CONCLUSION. To achieve a consistent contrast enhancement in cardiac CT angiography (CTA), contrast-medium dose should be adjusted with the body weight or the BSA (which accounts for both the body weight and height factors) to provide adjustment of iodine dose over a wide range of body sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 784
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - Initial experience
    Achenbach, S
    Ropers, D
    Kuettner, A
    Flohr, T
    Ohnesorge, B
    Bruder, H
    Theessen, H
    Karakaya, M
    Daniel, WG
    Bautz, W
    Kalender, WA
    Anders, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2006, 57 (03) : 331 - 335
  • [2] Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation
    Achenbach, S
    Ropers, D
    Pohle, FK
    Raaz, D
    von Erffa, J
    Yilmaz, A
    Muschiol, G
    Daniel, WG
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (19) : 1978 - 1986
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1935, The growth of the surface area of the human body
  • [4] Effect of contrast injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight and fixed injection duration on aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector-row helical CT
    Awai, K
    Hori, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (09) : 2155 - 2160
  • [5] Scan and contrast administration principles of MDCT
    Bae, KT
    Heiken, JP
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 : E46 - E59
  • [6] Test-bolus versus bolus-tracking techniques for CT angiographic timing
    Bae, KT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (01) : 369 - 370
  • [7] Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: When does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model
    Bae, KT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (03) : 809 - 816
  • [8] Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model
    Bae, KT
    Heiken, JP
    Brink, JA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) : 657 - 662
  • [9] Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT part I. Prediction with a computer model
    Bae, KT
    Heiken, JP
    Brink, JA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) : 647 - 655
  • [10] Bae KT, 2003, APPL RADIOL, V32, P12, DOI [10.1007/88-470-0413-6_2, DOI 10.1007/88-470-0413-6_2]